Engineer B Confidentiality Safety Override

@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case15:Engineer_B_Confidentiality_Safety_Override a proeth:ConfidentialitySafetyOverrideConstraint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B Confidentiality Safety Override" ; proeth-core:constrainedEntity case15:Agent_Engineer_B ; proeth:caseContext "BER Case 96-8 established the procedural sequence for a peer reviewer operating under a confidentiality agreement who discovers potential safety code violations. This precedent is cited in the present case as governing background for the confidential peer review context." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Constraint" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:constrainedEntity "Engineer B (peer reviewer role, by analogy from BER Case 96-8)" ; proeth:constraintClass "Confidentiality Safety Override Constraint" ; proeth:constraintStatement "A peer reviewer bound by a confidentiality agreement who discovers safety code violations must first seek resolution with the reviewed engineer, then advise that engineer of the intent to notify authorities, and then notify appropriate authorities if resolution fails. The confidentiality obligation does not suppress this escalation duty." ; proeth:severity "critical" ; proeth:source "BER Case 96-8, NSPE Code of Ethics" ; proeth:temporalScope "Upon discovery of safety code violations during a confidential peer review" ; proeth:textReferences "Engineer A contractually agreed not to disclose confidential information acquired in the review", "Engineer A had an obligation to immediately discuss these issues with Engineer B in order to seek clarification and resolution", "if Engineers A and B were unable to successfully resolve Engineer A's concerns, Engineer A had an obligation to first advise Engineer B that Engineer A had an obligation to inform the appropriate authorities, and then to so inform the appropriate authorities" ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T20:00:50.100159+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ; proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A had an obligation to immediately discuss these issues with Engineer B in order to seek clarification and resolution" ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext", "confidence", "constraintClass", "constraintStatement", "severity", "source", "temporalScope", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "A peer reviewer bound by a confidentiality agreement who discovers safety code violations must first seek resolution with the reviewed engineer, then advise that engineer of the intent to notify authorities, and then notify appropriate authorities if resolution fails. The confidentiality obligation does not suppress this escalation duty." ; skos:definition "A peer reviewer bound by a confidentiality agreement who discovers safety code violations must first seek resolution with the reviewed engineer, then advise that engineer of the intent to notify authorities, and then notify appropriate authorities if resolution fails. The confidentiality obligation does not suppress this escalation duty." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T20:00:50.100159+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .