Engineer B Confidentiality Review Scope

Cs · Constraint Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_B_Confidentiality_Review_Scope_Constraint
Definition

Engineer B's peer review findings were subject to a confidentiality obligation to the Owner, limiting disclosure to third parties, but this confidentiality constraint did not eliminate Engineer B's overriding obligations where safety findings required broader disclosure.

Properties
Instance of
ConfidentialityConstraint
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConfidentialityConstraint
Case context
Engineer B was retained by the Owner to conduct a peer review under terms that included confidentiality to the Owner. This created a constraint on disclosure of review findings, but the constraint was defeasible in the event that safety-critical findings required escalation beyond the client relationship.
Confidence
0.83
Constraint statement
Engineer B's peer review findings were subject to a confidentiality obligation to the Owner, limiting disclosure to third parties, but this confidentiality constraint did not eliminate Engineer B's overriding obligations where safety findings required broader disclosure.
Severity
medium
Source
NSPE Code of Ethics; contractual confidentiality terms of the peer review engagement
Temporal scope
Throughout and following the peer review engagement
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Confidentiality Constraint'
Matched Ontology Label
Confidentiality Constraint
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
confidence
constraintClass
constraintStatement
severity
source
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
constrainedEntity Agent Engineer B
Source Evidence
Text references
Owner decides to obtain a peer review of the plans and design of Engineer A for the second tower and retains Engineer B.
Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know.

Source text
Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case15:Engineer_B_Confidentiality_Review_Scope_Constraint a proeth:ConfidentialityConstraint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B Confidentiality Review Scope" ; proeth-core:constrainedEntity case15:Agent_Engineer_B ; proeth:caseContext "Engineer B was retained by the Owner to conduct a peer review under terms that included confidentiality to the Owner. This created a constraint on disclosure of review findings, but the constraint was defeasible in the event that safety-critical findings required escalation beyond the client relationship." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Constraint" ; proeth:confidence "0.83" ; proeth:constrainedEntity "Engineer B" ; proeth:constraintClass "Confidentiality Constraint" ; proeth:constraintStatement "Engineer B's peer review findings were subject to a confidentiality obligation to the Owner, limiting disclosure to third parties, but this confidentiality constraint did not eliminate Engineer B's overriding obligations where safety findings required broader disclosure." ; proeth:severity "medium" ; proeth:source "NSPE Code of Ethics; contractual confidentiality terms of the peer review engagement" ; proeth:temporalScope "Throughout and following the peer review engagement" ; proeth:textReferences "Owner decides to obtain a peer review of the plans and design of Engineer A for the second tower and retains Engineer B.", "Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know." ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:57:27.688172+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Confidentiality Constraint'" ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:ConfidentialityConstraint ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Confidentiality Constraint" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know." ; proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext", "confidence", "constraintClass", "constraintStatement", "severity", "source", "temporalScope", "textReferences" ; rdfs:comment "Engineer B's peer review findings were subject to a confidentiality obligation to the Owner, limiting disclosure to third parties, but this confidentiality constraint did not eliminate Engineer B's overriding obligations where safety findings required broader disclosure." ; skos:definition "Engineer B's peer review findings were subject to a confidentiality obligation to the Owner, limiting disclosure to third parties, but this confidentiality constraint did not eliminate Engineer B's overriding obligations where safety findings required broader disclosure." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:57:27.688172+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-06-05 09:43
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:57:27.688172+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:57:27.688172+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction