Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation Refused
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Refused
Definition
Engineer A's posture toward Engineer B's peer review of Engineer A's design work
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewCooperationRefusedState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewCooperationRefusedState
Active period
From the point at which Engineer A is notified of the peer review and declines to cooperate through the Board's conclusion that non-cooperation is unethical
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Owner
Public
Confidence
0.9
Principle Transformation
Transforms general professional responsibility principles into a concrete duty to cooperate, especially when known defects elevate public safety concerns.
Subject
Engineer A's posture toward Engineer B's peer review of Engineer A's design work
Terminated by
Engineer A's full and cooperative participation in the peer review, or Owner's decision to proceed without Engineer A
Triggering event
Owner notifies Engineer A of the planned peer review and Engineer A refuses to consent and cooperate
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
Notification Obligation Triggered, Peer Review Blocked
activatesConstraint
Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation Constraint, Engineer A Safety Review Consent Limit
activatesObligation
Engineer A Professional Accountability Cooperation
affects
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B, Agent Owner
terminatedByEvent
Peer Review Blocked
Source Evidence
Text references
If Engineer A refused to consent and cooperate, Owner would be then face with three options
The known design defects in the first tower simply makes each of those requirements more urgent
the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate
Source text
If Engineer A refused to consent and cooperate, Owner would be then face with three options
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Refused a proeth:PeerReviewCooperationRefusedState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation Refused" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case15:Notification_Obligation_Triggered,
case15:Peer_Review_Blocked ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case15:Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Constraint,
case15:Engineer_A_Safety_Review_Consent_Limit ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case15:Engineer_A_Professional_Accountability_Cooperation ;
proeth-core:affects case15:Agent_Engineer_A,
case15:Agent_Engineer_B,
case15:Agent_Owner ;
proeth-core:terminatedByEvent case15:Peer_Review_Blocked ;
proeth:activePeriod "From the point at which Engineer A is notified of the peer review and declines to cooperate through the Board's conclusion that non-cooperation is unethical" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Owner",
"Public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms general professional responsibility principles into a concrete duty to cooperate, especially when known defects elevate public safety concerns." ;
proeth:stateClass "Peer Review Cooperation Refused State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's posture toward Engineer B's peer review of Engineer A's design work" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Engineer A's full and cooperative participation in the peer review, or Owner's decision to proceed without Engineer A" ;
proeth:textReferences "If Engineer A refused to consent and cooperate, Owner would be then face with three options",
"The known design defects in the first tower simply makes each of those requirements more urgent",
"the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate" ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Owner notifies Engineer A of the planned peer review and Engineer A refuses to consent and cooperate" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "If Engineer A refused to consent and cooperate, Owner would be then face with three options" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A's posture toward Engineer B's peer review of Engineer A's design work" ;
skos:definition "Engineer A's posture toward Engineer B's peer review of Engineer A's design work" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction