Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Obligation
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to cooperate fully with Engineer B's peer review of the second tower plans, given the known design errors in the first tower and the public safety implications of the second tower design.
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewCooperationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewCooperationObligation
Case context
After Owner agreed to notify Engineer A of the peer review, Engineer A refused to consent to or cooperate with the review, despite prior significant errors having been found in the first tower plans.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.95
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to cooperate fully with Engineer B's peer review of the second tower plans, given the known design errors in the first tower and the public safety implications of the second tower design.
Temporal scope
Upon notification of the peer review and throughout its conduct
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A Known Design Defects
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Cooperation Duty
Source Evidence
Text references
Each of those requirements strongly indicates that Engineer A should participate fully and cooperatively in Engineer B's peer review.
Engineers must take responsibility for their actions, must acknowledge their errors, must act in the best interests of their clients, and must at all times hold paramount the health, welfare, and safety of the public.
Under the facts, the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate.
Source text
Under the facts, the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Obligation a proeth:PeerReviewCooperationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case15:Engineer_A_Known_Design_Defects ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case15:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "After Owner agreed to notify Engineer A of the peer review, Engineer A refused to consent to or cooperate with the review, despite prior significant errors having been found in the first tower plans." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case15:Engineer_A_Cooperation_Duty ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Peer Review Cooperation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to cooperate fully with Engineer B's peer review of the second tower plans, given the known design errors in the first tower and the public safety implications of the second tower design." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Upon notification of the peer review and throughout its conduct" ;
proeth:textReferences "Each of those requirements strongly indicates that Engineer A should participate fully and cooperatively in Engineer B's peer review.",
"Engineers must take responsibility for their actions, must acknowledge their errors, must act in the best interests of their clients, and must at all times hold paramount the health, welfare, and safety of the public.",
"Under the facts, the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Under the facts, the Board concludes that it would be unethical for Engineer A to fail to cooperate." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to cooperate fully with Engineer B's peer review of the second tower plans, given the known design errors in the first tower and the public safety implications of the second tower design." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to cooperate fully with Engineer B's peer review of the second tower plans, given the known design errors in the first tower and the public safety implications of the second tower design." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction