DP9
Individual
2d435c7b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#DP9
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP9
Decision Question
Should Engineer B treat the peer review confidentiality framework as bounded by an independent public safety escalation obligation, such that Engineer B must report confirmed structural defects to public authorities if the Owner suppresses or declines to act on the findings?
Focus
Engineer B's obligation to escalate known design defects to public authorities if the Owner declines to act on peer review findings, resolving the tension between peer review confidentiality and the paramount public safety duty.
Option1
Treat the peer review confidentiality obligation as absolute and refrain from escalating findings to public authorities even if the Owner declines to act on confirmed structural defects
Option2
Recognize the peer review confidentiality framework as bounded by the public safety paramount obligation and escalate confirmed structural defects to relevant public authorities if the Owner suppresses or fails to act on the findings
Role Label
Engineer B Peer Review Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#DP9> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP9" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
2d435c7b25bf3b60...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T02:41:07.219244
Generated By
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction