Engineer F Privacy vs Material Omission Tension
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Privacy_vs_Material_Omission_Tension
Properties
Instance of
PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState
Active period
At the time of completing the employment application
Affected parties
Engineer F
Engineering firm employer
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer F's tension between relying on narrow question wording and disclosing material conduct history
Terminated by
Engineer F's decision to answer negatively (resolving the tension in favor of non-disclosure)
Triggering event
Engineer F's decision about how to respond to the narrowly worded disciplinary question given the contractor license revocation
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'
Text references
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application
Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked
there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Privacy_vs_Material_Omission_Tension a proeth:PrivacyRightvs.MaterialOmissionTensionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Privacy vs Material Omission Tension" ;
proeth:activeperiod "At the time of completing the employment application" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer F",
"Engineering firm employer" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ;
proeth:stateclass "Privacy Right vs. Material Omission Tension State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer F's tension between relying on narrow question wording and disclosing material conduct history" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer F's decision to answer negatively (resolving the tension in favor of non-disclosure)" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application",
"Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked",
"there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer F's decision about how to respond to the narrowly worded disciplinary question given the contractor license revocation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.564919"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.564919
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction