Engineer F Narrow Application Question Exploitable Omission
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Narrow_Application_Question_Exploitable_Omission
Properties
Instance of
NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState
Active period
At time of employment application submission
Affected parties
Engineer F
Engineer F's employer
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer F's exploitation of narrowly-worded PE license discipline question to omit contractor revocation
Terminated by
Ethics board determination that narrow reading was ethically impermissible
Triggering event
Employer's application question scoped only to PE license discipline, not contractor license discipline
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering
Text references
The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering
While Engineer F could claim a legalistic rationale for being evasive and not responding to the full implications of the question
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Narrow_Application_Question_Exploitable_Omission a proeth:NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Narrow Application Question Exploitable Omission" ;
proeth:activeperiod "At time of employment application submission" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer F",
"Engineer F's employer" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering" ;
proeth:stateclass "Narrow Application Question Exploitable Omission State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer F's exploitation of narrowly-worded PE license discipline question to omit contractor revocation" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Ethics board determination that narrow reading was ethically impermissible" ;
proeth:textreferences "The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering",
"While Engineer F could claim a legalistic rationale for being evasive and not responding to the full implications of the question" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Employer's application question scoped only to PE license discipline, not contractor license discipline" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.567354"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.567354
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction