Engineer F Employment Application Narrow Question Omission
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Employment_Application_Narrow_Question_Omission
Properties
Instance of
NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState
Active period
At the time of completing the employment application; discovered later by the engineering firm
Affected parties
Engineer F
Prospective employer engineering firm
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer F's response to the employment application disciplinary question
Terminated by
Engineering firm's independent discovery of the contractor license revocation
Triggering event
Engineer F answering 'no' to the question about PE discipline/license suspension or revocation, while holding a revoked contractor's license
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'
Text references
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application
the engineering firm learns that while Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked
there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Employment_Application_Narrow_Question_Omission a proeth:NarrowApplicationQuestionExploitableOmissionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Employment Application Narrow Question Omission" ;
proeth:activeperiod "At the time of completing the employment application; discovered later by the engineering firm" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer F",
"Prospective employer engineering firm" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ;
proeth:stateclass "Narrow Application Question Exploitable Omission State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer F's response to the employment application disciplinary question" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineering firm's independent discovery of the contractor license revocation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application",
"the engineering firm learns that while Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked",
"there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer F answering 'no' to the question about PE discipline/license suspension or revocation, while holding a revoked contractor's license" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.564418"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.564418
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction