Engineer F Cross-Domain License Revocation Non-Disclosure
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Cross-Domain_License_Revocation_Non-Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
Cross-DomainLicenseRevocationNon-DisclosureState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Cross-DomainLicenseRevocationNon-DisclosureState
Active period
From submission of employment application through employer's discovery of the revocation
Affected parties
Clients of the engineering firm who would be served by Engineer F
Engineer F
Engineering firm employer
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer F's non-disclosure of contractor license revocation on PE employment application
Terminated by
Engineering firm's independent discovery of the contractor license revocation
Triggering event
Engineer F completing the employment application without disclosing the contractor license revocation, relying on the narrow PE-specific framing of the question
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application
Text references
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application
Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project
Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Cross-Domain_License_Revocation_Non-Disclosure a proeth:Cross-DomainLicenseRevocationNon-DisclosureState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Cross-Domain License Revocation Non-Disclosure" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From submission of employment application through employer's discovery of the revocation" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Clients of the engineering firm who would be served by Engineer F",
"Engineer F",
"Engineering firm employer" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application" ;
proeth:stateclass "Cross-Domain License Revocation Non-Disclosure State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer F's non-disclosure of contractor license revocation on PE employment application" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineering firm's independent discovery of the contractor license revocation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application",
"Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project",
"Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer F completing the employment application without disclosing the contractor license revocation, relying on the narrow PE-specific framing of the question" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.567112"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.567112
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction