Engineer F Adjudicated Wrongdoing Disclosure Obligation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Wrongdoing_Disclosure_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
AdjudicatedWrongdoingDisclosureObligationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdjudicatedWrongdoingDisclosureObligationState
Active period
From the time of contractor license revocation through the employment application process
Affected parties
Engineer F
Engineering firm employer
Confidence
0.78
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer F's obligation to disclose the contractor license revocation as an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing
Terminated by
Not resolved within the case facts
Triggering event
Formal revocation of contractor's license constituting an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing (facilitating unlicensed practice)
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project
Text references
Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project
On the engineering firm employment application, there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Wrongdoing_Disclosure_Obligation a proeth:AdjudicatedWrongdoingDisclosureObligationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Adjudicated Wrongdoing Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the time of contractor license revocation through the employment application process" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer F",
"Engineering firm employer" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project" ;
proeth:stateclass "Adjudicated Wrongdoing Disclosure Obligation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer F's obligation to disclose the contractor license revocation as an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not resolved within the case facts" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project",
"On the engineering firm employment application, there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Formal revocation of contractor's license constituting an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing (facilitating unlicensed practice)" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.564646"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:50:30.298058+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.564646
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction