Engineer A Pending Ethics Complaint Non-Disclosure (BER 97-11 Precedent)
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_A_Pending_Ethics_Complaint_Non-Disclosure_BER_97-11_Precedent
Properties
Instance of
PendingEthicsComplaintNon-DisclosureState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PendingEthicsComplaintNon-DisclosureState
Active period
During Engineer A's service to Client B while complaint from Client C was pending
Affected parties
Client B
Client C
Engineer A
State board
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's non-disclosure to Client B of pending ethics complaint filed by Client C (BER Case 97-11)
Terminated by
Client B learned of complaint through another party
Triggering event
Client C filed ethics complaint against Engineer A with state board during Engineer A's engagement with Client B
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A did not believe it was necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint
Text references
A complaint is a mere allegation and does not amount to a finding of fact or conclusion of law
Engineer A did not believe it was necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint
No engineer should be compelled to disclose potentially damaging allegations about his professional practice
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_A_Pending_Ethics_Complaint_Non-Disclosure_BER_97-11_Precedent a proeth:PendingEthicsComplaintNon-DisclosureState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Pending Ethics Complaint Non-Disclosure (BER 97-11 Precedent)" ;
proeth:activeperiod "During Engineer A's service to Client B while complaint from Client C was pending" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client B",
"Client C",
"Engineer A",
"State board" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A did not believe it was necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint" ;
proeth:stateclass "Pending Ethics Complaint Non-Disclosure State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's non-disclosure to Client B of pending ethics complaint filed by Client C (BER Case 97-11)" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client B learned of complaint through another party" ;
proeth:textreferences "A complaint is a mere allegation and does not amount to a finding of fact or conclusion of law",
"Engineer A did not believe it was necessary to notify Client B of the pending complaint",
"No engineer should be compelled to disclose potentially damaging allegations about his professional practice" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client C filed ethics complaint against Engineer A with state board during Engineer A's engagement with Client B" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.567894"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:52:20.599552+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.567894
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction