DP9
Individual
5c268192
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#DP9
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP9
Decision Question
Should the Engineering Firm Hiring Authority disclose Engineer F's adjudicated contractor license revocation to relevant parties — such as clients, project teams, or licensing authorities — upon discovering it, or treat the matter as an internal employment issue requiring no external disclosure?
Focus
Engineering Firm Hiring Authority: Post-Discovery Disclosure Obligation Regarding Engineer F's Adjudicated Revocation
Option1
Upon discovering the revocation, notify clients on active projects where Engineer F's role implicates fitness and integrity, and assess whether the circumstances require reporting to the state engineering licensing board or other regulatory authority, treating the public safety paramount canon as the operative obligation.
Option2
Address the discovery through internal employment action — reassignment, remediation, or termination — without external disclosure to clients or regulators, on the grounds that the revocation predates the employment relationship, no active project safety risk has been identified, and the matter is an internal personnel decision within the firm's discretion.
Option3
Conduct a structured review of all projects to which Engineer F has been assigned to determine whether the fire protection domain revocation creates a material safety or integrity risk on any active engagement, and limit external disclosure to those specific projects where the domain-relevance amplification principle applies — avoiding blanket disclosure where the revocation is not materially relevant.
Role Label
Engineering Firm Hiring Authority
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#DP9> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP9" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
5c2681924cd018e4...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-28T23:27:29.020984
Generated By
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction