Engineer A Allegation Non-Equivalence Disclosure Calibration Client B

@prefix case147: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case147:Engineer_A_Allegation_Non-Equivalence_Disclosure_Calibration_Client_B a proeth:AllegationNon-EquivalencetoAdjudicationDisclosureCalibrationObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Allegation Non-Equivalence Disclosure Calibration Client B" ; proeth-core:competesWith case147:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Toward_Client_B_Complaint_Context, case147:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Transparency_Obligation_Toward_Client_B, case147:Engineer_A_Pending_Competence_Complaint_Disclosure_Obligation_to_Client_B, case147:Engineer_A_Prudential_Disclosure_Weighing_Toward_Client_B, case147:Engineer_A_Valence-Neutral_Misleading_Omission_Non-Disclosure_Pending_Complaint ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/147#Client_C_Competence_Allegation_—_Similar_Services_Context> ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case147:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Toward_Client_B_Complaint_Context, case147:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Transparency_Obligation_Toward_Client_B, case147:Engineer_A_Pending_Competence_Complaint_Disclosure_Obligation_to_Client_B ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer A is subject to a pending ethics complaint by Client C alleging lack of competence for services similar to those being performed for Client B. The Board analyzed whether the allegation status of the complaint affected the disclosure obligation." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.93" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case147:Allegation-Adjudication_Distinction_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_Non-Disclosure_Decision ; proeth:discoveredincase "147" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T07:47:26.067073+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "147" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T07:47:26.067073+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Allegation Non-Equivalence to Adjudication Disclosure Calibration Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to recognize that the pending ethics complaint filed by Client C constituted a mere allegation — not a finding of fact or conclusion of law — and therefore was not automatically required to disclose it to Client B, while retaining discretion to weigh all factors and take prudent action proportionate to the nature and seriousness of the charges." ; proeth:sourcetext "A complaint is a mere allegation and does not amount to a finding of fact or conclusion of law." ; proeth:temporalscope "During the period the ethics complaint was pending and unresolved" ; proeth:textreferences "A complaint is a mere allegation and does not amount to a finding of fact or conclusion of law.", "No engineer should be compelled to disclose potentially damaging allegations about his professional practice -- allegations that could be false, baseless, and motivated by some malicious intent.", "The Board is of the opinion that while an engineer clearly has an ethical obligation to act as a faithful agent and trustee for the benefit of a client, avoid deceptive acts, be objective and truthful, avoid conflicts, etc., such obligations would not compel an engineer to automatically disclose that a complaint had been filed against the engineer with the state engineering licensure board." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 147 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T07:56:55.817497"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 147 Extraction" .