DP11
Individual
d907ae9b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/146#DP11
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP11
Decision Question
Does the allegation-adjudication framework established in BER 97-11 and BER 03-6 map onto Engineer A's autism non-disclosure in a way that renders it ethically permissible, or does the 25-year duration and multi-employer scope of the omission make it structurally analogous to Engineer F's active concealment of an adjudicated professional sanction?
Focus
Applying the allegation-adjudication distinction from BER 97-11 and BER 03-6 to determine whether Engineer A's autism non-disclosure is analogous to Engineer F's concealment of an adjudicated license revocation or to the permissible non-disclosure of a pending complaint
Option1
Treat the BER 97-11 and BER 03-6 framework as mapping favorably onto Engineer A's situation, concluding that autism non-disclosure is categorically more permissible than either precedent scenario and requires no corrective disclosure action
Option2
Treat the 25-year multi-employer duration of non-disclosure as functionally analogous to Engineer F's active concealment on a formal application, and voluntarily disclose the autism diagnosis to the current employer to cure any ongoing omission that the Code's deception provision might reach
Option3
Distinguish the BER precedents as inapplicable to ADA-protected conditions while proactively documenting the legal and ethical basis for non-disclosure in personal records, so that if the question arises in a future employment application or licensing renewal, Engineer A can demonstrate good-faith reliance on a principled framework rather than evasion
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_146: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/146> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/146#DP11> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP11" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
d907ae9beed447a6...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T17:18:22.284407
Generated By
ProEthica Case 146 Extraction