DP6
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/145#DP6
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP6
Decision question
Should Engineer A present his regulatory testimony using his U.S. DOE-branded PowerPoint — which displays his government job title throughout — or use a presentation that reflects only his personal technical credentials and explicitly identifies his consulting relationship with the coal bed methane company?
Focus
Engineer A: Use of DOE-Branded Presentation Materials in Privately Retained Regulatory Testimony
Option1
Prepare and deliver a presentation that omits DOE branding and job title identification, presents only personal technical credentials, and explicitly identifies his consulting relationship with and compensation from the coal bed methane company, so that the regulatory body and public record accurately reflect his actual capacity.
Option2
Proceed with the DOE-branded PowerPoint as prepared but supplement it with an explicit oral statement at the outset of testimony disclosing the private retainer and distinguishing his consulting capacity from his government employment, treating the credential display as a truthful representation of his qualifications rather than an institutional endorsement.
Option3
Present testimony using the existing DOE-branded PowerPoint on the basis that his government job title is a truthful credential identifier, that he disclosed his State X licensure limitation, and that the regulatory body bears responsibility for inquiring into financial relationships if it considers them material to the proceeding.
Role
Engineer
TTL
@prefix case145: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/145#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case145:DP6 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP6" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP6" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A present his regulatory testimony using his U.S. DOE-branded PowerPoint — which displays his government job title throughout — or use a presentation that reflects only his personal technical credentials and explicitly identifies his consulting relationship with the coal bed methane company?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A: Use of DOE-Branded Presentation Materials in Privately Retained Regulatory Testimony" ;
proeth:option1 "Prepare and deliver a presentation that omits DOE branding and job title identification, presents only personal technical credentials, and explicitly identifies his consulting relationship with and compensation from the coal bed methane company, so that the regulatory body and public record accurately reflect his actual capacity." ;
proeth:option2 "Proceed with the DOE-branded PowerPoint as prepared but supplement it with an explicit oral statement at the outset of testimony disclosing the private retainer and distinguishing his consulting capacity from his government employment, treating the credential display as a truthful representation of his qualifications rather than an institutional endorsement." ;
proeth:option3 "Present testimony using the existing DOE-branded PowerPoint on the basis that his government job title is a truthful credential identifier, that he disclosed his State X licensure limitation, and that the regulatory body bears responsibility for inquiring into financial relationships if it considers them material to the proceeding." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T18:48:29.689188"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 145 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-28T18:48:29.689188
Generated by
ProEthica Case 145 Extraction