Self-Review Prohibition Irresolvable by Disclosure State
Class
e9325247
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Self-ReviewProhibitionIrresolvablebyDisclosureState
Definition
State in which a professional engineer serving in a dual advisory and design capacity for the same municipal client would be placed in the position of reviewing or passing judgment on their own engineering work — creating a conflict of interest that cannot be resolved through disclosure of circumstances, distinguishing this situation from cases (such as BER Case 01-11) where the advisory engineer does not review their own work and where disclosure of further circumstances may be sufficient to manage the conflict.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which a professional engineer serving in a dual advisory and design capacity for the same municipal client would be placed in the position of reviewing or passing judgment on their own engineering work — creating a conflict of interest that cannot be resolved through disclosure of circumstances, distinguishing this situation from cases (such as BER Case 01-11) where the advisory engineer does not review their own work and where disclosure of further circumstances may be sufficient to manage the conflict.
Source Evidence
Source Text
contrary to the situation in BER Case 01-11, the performance of such services by Engineer A potentially places him in the situation of reviewing his own work
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Self-ReviewProhibitionIrresolvablebyDisclosureState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Self-Review Prohibition Irresolvable by Disclosure State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which a professional engineer serving in a dual advisory and design capacity for the same municipal client would be placed in the position of reviewing or passing judgment on their own engineering work — creating a conflict of interest that cannot be resolved through disclosure of circumstances, distinguishing this situation from cases (such as BER Case 01-11) where the advisory engineer does not review their own work and where disclosure of further circumstances may be sufficient to manage the conflict." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
e9325247d6f2bec3...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
105
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
discussion
First Discovered At
2026-02-28T08:30:32.821445+00:00
First Discovered In Case
105
Generated
2026-02-28T08:30:32.821445+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 105 Extraction