Engineer Doe Single-Public-Role County Engineer Recommendation Sufficiency Conflict Prohibition Activation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/143#Engineer_Doe_Single-Public-Role_County_Engineer_Recommendation_Sufficiency_Conflict_Prohibition_Activation
Properties
Instance of
Single-Public-RoleSufficiencyConflictProhibitionActivationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Single-Public-RoleSufficiencyConflictProhibitionActivationObligation
Case context
The Board explicitly held that Engineer Doe would have been in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board, by virtue of his employment as county engineer and the county engineer's responsibility to submit plans to the planning board with recommendation.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.94
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer Doe
Obligation statement
Engineer Doe was obligated to recognize that his role as county engineer — with responsibility to submit subdivision plans to the planning board with recommendation — was alone sufficient to trigger the absolute Section 8(b) conflict prohibition with respect to plans he prepared in private practice, even without his additional role as a planning board member.
Temporal scope
From the moment of accepting the county engineer role while simultaneously preparing private subdivision plans
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Single-Role Public Authority Sufficiency Invoked in Engineer Doe Case
Source Evidence
Source text
He would be in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board by virtue of his employment as the county engineer and the responsibility of the county engineer to submit the plans to the county planning board with recommendation.
Text references
He would be in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board by virtue of his employment as the county engineer and the responsibility of the county engineer to submit the plans to the county planning board with recommendation.
TTL
@prefix case143: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/143#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case143:Engineer_Doe_Single-Public-Role_County_Engineer_Recommendation_Sufficiency_Conflict_Prohibition_Activation a proeth:Single-Public-RoleSufficiencyConflictProhibitionActivationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer Doe Single-Public-Role County Engineer Recommendation Sufficiency Conflict Prohibition Activation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case143:Engineer_Doe_Triple-Role_Self-Approval_Structural_Conflict_Non-Acceptance ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case143:Engineer_Doe_Triple-Role_Self-Approval_Structural_Conflict_Non-Acceptance ;
proeth:casecontext "The Board explicitly held that Engineer Doe would have been in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board, by virtue of his employment as county engineer and the county engineer's responsibility to submit plans to the planning board with recommendation." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.94" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case143:Single-Role_Public_Authority_Sufficiency_Invoked_in_Engineer_Doe_Case ;
proeth:discoveredincase "143" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T13:43:59.413008+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "143" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T13:43:59.413008+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer Doe" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Single-Public-Role Sufficiency Conflict Prohibition Activation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer Doe was obligated to recognize that his role as county engineer — with responsibility to submit subdivision plans to the planning board with recommendation — was alone sufficient to trigger the absolute Section 8(b) conflict prohibition with respect to plans he prepared in private practice, even without his additional role as a planning board member." ;
proeth:sourcetext "He would be in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board by virtue of his employment as the county engineer and the responsibility of the county engineer to submit the plans to the county planning board with recommendation." ;
proeth:temporalscope "From the moment of accepting the county engineer role while simultaneously preparing private subdivision plans" ;
proeth:textreferences "He would be in violation of Section 8(b) even if he had not been a member of the county planning board by virtue of his employment as the county engineer and the responsibility of the county engineer to submit the plans to the county planning board with recommendation." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 143 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T13:52:09.592218"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 143 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
143
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T13:43:59.413008+00:00
First case
143
Generated
2026-03-02T13:43:59.413008+00:00
Attributed to
Case 143 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T13:52:09.592218
Generated by
ProEthica Case 143 Extraction