Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Individual
55dd19c4
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/142#Client_Confidentiality_vs._Public_Safety_Balancing_Framework
Properties
Parent
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.9
Createdby
Professional engineering ethics bodies
Documenttitle
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Usedby
Engineer A in evaluating the ethics of hearing participation
Usedincontext
Governs how Engineer A must balance confidentiality obligations to former employer Company X against the paramount obligation to protect consumer safety when deciding whether and how to testify at the public safety standards hearing
Version
Current professional norms
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A is considering participating as a witness at the public safety standards hearing
Text References
Engineer A is considering participating as a witness at the public safety standards hearing
Later, Engineer A resigns from Company X
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_142: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/142> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/142#Client_Confidentiality_vs._Public_Safety_Balancing_Framework> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
55dd19c44e050e04...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
142
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-27T22:54:05.369207+00:00
First Case
142
Generated
2026-02-27T22:54:05.369207+00:00
Attributed To
Case 142 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:16:07.690724
Generated By
ProEthica Case 142 Extraction