Engineer A Complete Options Analysis Duty
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_Complete_Options_Analysis_Duty
Definition
Engineer A was required to provide a complete analysis of all four project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons, but instead provided only a partial comparative evaluation that omitted full analysis and favored the option beneficial to Engineer A.
Properties
Instance of
CompleteOptionsAnalysisPrinciple
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompleteOptionsAnalysisPrinciple
Applied to
Advisory evaluation of Progressive-Design-Build, Construction-Manager-at-Risk, and other delivery methodologies for City B
Balancing with
Advisory Role Integrity Principle
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Principle
Concrete expression
Engineer A was required to provide a complete analysis of all four project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons, but instead provided only a partial comparative evaluation that omitted full analysis and favored the option beneficial to Engineer A.
Confidence
0.92
Interpretation
The complete options analysis obligation required Engineer A to cover all material methodologies with balanced treatment, or to refer City B to neutral resources, rather than providing a self-serving partial analysis.
Tension resolution
The BER found no justification for the partial analysis; Engineer A had clear alternatives including referral to neutral resources or a genuinely complete analysis.
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
appliedTo
balancingWith
concreteExpression
confidence
interpretation
principleClass
tensionResolution
textReferences
Relationships
invokedBy
Agent Engineer A
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A could have provided a complete analysis of the four methodologies, with all the pros and cons by compiling properly referenced resources from others
by providing only a partial, comparative engineering evaluation with no analysis and a recommendation to Engineer A's benefit
Source text
Engineer A could have provided a complete analysis of the four methodologies, with all the pros and cons by compiling properly referenced resources from others, involving no provision of engineering services and thus not unethical.
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_Complete_Options_Analysis_Duty a proeth:CompleteOptionsAnalysisPrinciple,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Complete Options Analysis Duty" ;
proeth-core:invokedBy case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:appliedTo "Advisory evaluation of Progressive-Design-Build, Construction-Manager-at-Risk, and other delivery methodologies for City B" ;
proeth:balancingWith "Advisory Role Integrity Principle",
"Conflict of Interest Disclosure Principle" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteExpression "Engineer A was required to provide a complete analysis of all four project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons, but instead provided only a partial comparative evaluation that omitted full analysis and favored the option beneficial to Engineer A." ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:interpretation "The complete options analysis obligation required Engineer A to cover all material methodologies with balanced treatment, or to refer City B to neutral resources, rather than providing a self-serving partial analysis." ;
proeth:invokedBy "Engineer A Delivery Advisor Incomplete" ;
proeth:principleClass "Complete Options Analysis Principle" ;
proeth:tensionResolution "The BER found no justification for the partial analysis; Engineer A had clear alternatives including referral to neutral resources or a genuinely complete analysis." ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A could have provided a complete analysis of the four methodologies, with all the pros and cons by compiling properly referenced resources from others",
"by providing only a partial, comparative engineering evaluation with no analysis and a recommendation to Engineer A's benefit" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:46:54.906706+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A could have provided a complete analysis of the four methodologies, with all the pros and cons by compiling properly referenced resources from others, involving no provision of engineering services and thus not unethical." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "appliedTo",
"balancingWith",
"concreteExpression",
"confidence",
"interpretation",
"principleClass",
"tensionResolution",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was required to provide a complete analysis of all four project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons, but instead provided only a partial comparative evaluation that omitted full analysis and favored the option beneficial to Engineer A." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was required to provide a complete analysis of all four project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons, but instead provided only a partial comparative evaluation that omitted full analysis and favored the option beneficial to Engineer A." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:46:54.906706+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:46:54.906706+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:46:54.906706+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction