Engineer A Advisory Scope Completeness
Cs · Constraint
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_Advisory_Scope_Completeness
Definition
Engineer A was constrained to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons in the advisory memo, and was prohibited from selectively presenting only the two methodologies under which Engineer A stood to benefit from subsequent paid work.
Properties
Instance of
AdvisoryScopeCompletenessConstraint
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdvisoryScopeCompletenessConstraint
Case context
City Administrator requested an analysis of water and wastewater project delivery methodologies. Engineer A's memo addressed only two of four approved methods, omitting Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build, which were the two methods under which Engineer A was not qualified to provide services.
Confidence
0.92
Constraint statement
Engineer A was constrained to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons in the advisory memo, and was prohibited from selectively presenting only the two methodologies under which Engineer A stood to benefit from subsequent paid work.
Severity
high
Source
NSPE Code of Ethics, BER Case 95-5, BER Case 99-8
Temporal scope
At the time Engineer A prepared the advisory memo for City Administrator
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
confidence
constraintClass
constraintStatement
severity
source
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
constrainedEntity
Agent Engineer A
Source Evidence
Text references
by providing only a partial, comparative engineering evaluation with no analysis and a recommendation to Engineer A's benefit, the conduct constituted both incomplete and self-serving information
include all relevant and pertinent information
Source text
include all relevant and pertinent information
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_Advisory_Scope_Completeness a proeth:AdvisoryScopeCompletenessConstraint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Advisory Scope Completeness" ;
proeth-core:constrainedEntity case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "City Administrator requested an analysis of water and wastewater project delivery methodologies. Engineer A's memo addressed only two of four approved methods, omitting Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build, which were the two methods under which Engineer A was not qualified to provide services." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Constraint" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:constrainedEntity "Engineer A" ;
proeth:constraintClass "Advisory Scope Completeness Constraint" ;
proeth:constraintStatement "Engineer A was constrained to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons in the advisory memo, and was prohibited from selectively presenting only the two methodologies under which Engineer A stood to benefit from subsequent paid work." ;
proeth:severity "high" ;
proeth:source "NSPE Code of Ethics, BER Case 95-5, BER Case 99-8" ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time Engineer A prepared the advisory memo for City Administrator" ;
proeth:textReferences "by providing only a partial, comparative engineering evaluation with no analysis and a recommendation to Engineer A's benefit, the conduct constituted both incomplete and self-serving information",
"include all relevant and pertinent information" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:48:44.763664+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "include all relevant and pertinent information" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"confidence",
"constraintClass",
"constraintStatement",
"severity",
"source",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was constrained to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons in the advisory memo, and was prohibited from selectively presenting only the two methodologies under which Engineer A stood to benefit from subsequent paid work." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was constrained to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methodologies with their respective pros and cons in the advisory memo, and was prohibited from selectively presenting only the two methodologies under which Engineer A stood to benefit from subsequent paid work." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:48:44.763664+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:48:44.763664+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:48:44.763664+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction