Engineer A Advisory Role Objectivity
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_Advisory_Role_Objectivity
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to provide City B with an objective, unbiased analysis of all available project delivery methods and to refrain from using the advisory memo as a vehicle to promote the firm's own construction services under the recommended delivery method.
Properties
Instance of
AdvisoryRoleObjectivityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdvisoryRoleObjectivityObligation
Case context
Engineer A had no existing contractual relationship with City B and was asked to advise on project delivery methods. Engineer A recommended the delivery method under which the firm is qualified to provide construction services and included promotional firm experience and references in the advisory memo.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.91
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to provide City B with an objective, unbiased analysis of all available project delivery methods and to refrain from using the advisory memo as a vehicle to promote the firm's own construction services under the recommended delivery method.
Temporal scope
Throughout the preparation and submission of the advisory memo
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A Self-Serving Advisory Recommendation
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A Conflict of Interest Undisclosed
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Objectivity Advisory
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A currently has no contractual relationship with City B.
Engineer A recommended Progressive Design Build. Accompanying the recommendation, Engineer A provided a summary of the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build projects and references from past projects.
Source text
Engineer A currently has no contractual relationship with City B.
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_Advisory_Role_Objectivity a proeth:AdvisoryRoleObjectivityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Advisory Role Objectivity" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case14:Engineer_A_Self-Serving_Advisory_Recommendation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case14:Engineer_A_Conflict_of_Interest_Undisclosed ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A had no existing contractual relationship with City B and was asked to advise on project delivery methods. Engineer A recommended the delivery method under which the firm is qualified to provide construction services and included promotional firm experience and references in the advisory memo." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case14:Engineer_A_Objectivity_Advisory ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Advisory Role Objectivity Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to provide City B with an objective, unbiased analysis of all available project delivery methods and to refrain from using the advisory memo as a vehicle to promote the firm's own construction services under the recommended delivery method." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Throughout the preparation and submission of the advisory memo" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A currently has no contractual relationship with City B.",
"Engineer A recommended Progressive Design Build. Accompanying the recommendation, Engineer A provided a summary of the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build projects and references from past projects." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A currently has no contractual relationship with City B." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to provide City B with an objective, unbiased analysis of all available project delivery methods and to refrain from using the advisory memo as a vehicle to promote the firm's own construction services under the recommended delivery method." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to provide City B with an objective, unbiased analysis of all available project delivery methods and to refrain from using the advisory memo as a vehicle to promote the firm's own construction services under the recommended delivery method." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction