DP9
Individual
70a43cdc
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP9
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP9
Decision Question
Given that Engineer A's financial interest in Progressive-Design-Build created a structural conflict irreconcilable through disclosure alone, should Engineer A have declined to provide the advisory memo and instead referred City Administrator to a neutral independent consultant — and having already provided the incomplete memo, should Engineer A correct or disclose the omissions rather than allow City B to rely on a deficient analysis?
Focus
Engineer A's obligation to either correct the omissions in the advisory memo or refer City B's Administrator to a neutral third-party resource, given that the conflict of interest was structural and could not be fully mitigated through disclosure alone
Option1
Allow City B to rely on the incomplete advisory memo without correcting the omissions or disclosing the structural conflict of interest that shaped the analysis
Option2
Decline to provide the advisory memo and refer City Administrator to a neutral independent engineering consultant with no financial stake in the delivery method outcome
Option3
Supplement or correct the advisory memo to include a complete comparative analysis of all four approved delivery methods and explicitly disclose the structural conflict of interest before City B relies on the analysis for procurement decisions
Role Label
Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP9> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP9" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
70a43cdc997b526d...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T02:01:12.298070
Generated By
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction