DP7
Individual
470660cc
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP7
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision Question
Should Engineer A provide a complete comparative analysis of all four funding-approved delivery methods — including Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build — rather than presenting only the two methods under which Engineer A's firm could provide services?
Focus
Engineer A's obligation to provide a complete and objective comparative analysis of all four approved delivery methods when responding to City B's informal solicitation
Option1
Omit two delivery methods from the advisory memo and present only the methods under which Engineer A's firm can provide services
Option2
Provide a complete comparative analysis of all four funding-approved delivery methods, including objective evaluation of Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build alongside the two methods Engineer A can service, and disclose the regulatory constraint that would bar Engineer A from serving as Engineer of Record under Construction Manager at Risk
Role Label
Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP7> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP7" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
470660cc8ed95f42...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T02:01:12.297757
Generated By
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction