DP5
Individual
01f9ba1b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP5
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP5
Decision Question
Should Engineer A disclose to City B's Administrator that Engineer A's firm has a direct financial interest in the recommended delivery method — and either provide a complete conflict-disclosed analysis or refer City Administrator to a neutral third-party advisor — rather than proceeding with an undisclosed self-serving recommendation?
Focus
Engineer A: Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Faithful Agency Obligation to City B
Option1
Proceed with providing the advisory memo without disclosing Engineer A's financial interest in the recommended delivery method or Engineer A's qualification limitations
Option2
Disclose at the outset of the memo that Engineer A's firm is qualified to provide services under Progressive-Design-Build and has a financial interest in that recommendation, and provide a complete conflict-disclosed comparative analysis of all four delivery methods
Option3
Decline to provide the advisory memo and refer City Administrator to a neutral independent engineering consultant with no financial stake in any of the delivery method outcomes
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP5> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP5" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
01f9ba1b15aa3ea2...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T02:01:12.297530
Generated By
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction