DP4
Individual
7c53daf2
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP4
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Should Engineer A provide a complete comparative analysis of all four approved delivery methods — including Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build — rather than selectively presenting only the two methods under which Engineer A's firm could provide services?
Focus
Engineer A: Completeness and Objectivity Obligation in Advisory Memo to City B
Option1
Provide a selective advisory memo presenting only the two delivery methods under which Engineer A's firm can provide services, omitting Design-Bid-Build, Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and the funding agency's distinct-entity constraint
Option2
Provide a complete comparative analysis of all four funding-approved delivery methods, including objective evaluation of Design-Bid-Build and Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and disclose the funding agency's distinct-entity requirement for Construction Manager at Risk
Role Label
Engineer A Project Delivery Method Advisor
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
7c53daf2a4d8601c...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-25T02:01:12.297457
Generated By
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction