DP2
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#DP2
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP2
Decision question
Must Engineer A include all relevant delivery and financing options in the advisory memo, or may Engineer A limit the memo to options that align with Engineer A's preferred method?
Focus
Having decided to prepare the advisory memo, Engineer A must choose whether to present all relevant project delivery and financing options available to the city or to omit alternatives that would not favor Engineer A's preferred method. The normative record shows that Engineer A's compliance with completeness and objectivity obligations was unmet, and that the engineer possessed advanced proficiency in options completeness, making the omission a deliberate rather than inadvertent choice.
Option1
Engineer A prepares a memo that surveys the full range of project delivery methods and financing alternatives available to the city, with objective analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each, enabling the city to make a fully informed decision.
Option2
Engineer A selectively presents only the delivery method that aligns with Engineer A's expertise and business interests, omitting alternatives that might lead the city toward a different procurement path, thereby narrowing the city's decision space in Engineer A's favor.
Option3
Recognizing the conflict of interest inherent in advising on method selection while also being a potential contractor, Engineer A discloses the conflict and recommends that the city retain an independent advisor to evaluate delivery options objectively.
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
case14:DP2 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP2" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Must Engineer A include all relevant delivery and financing options in the advisory memo, or may Engineer A limit the memo to options that align with Engineer A's preferred method?" ;
proeth:focus "Having decided to prepare the advisory memo, Engineer A must choose whether to present all relevant project delivery and financing options available to the city or to omit alternatives that would not favor Engineer A's preferred method. The normative record shows that Engineer A's compliance with completeness and objectivity obligations was unmet, and that the engineer possessed advanced proficiency in options completeness, making the omission a deliberate rather than inadvertent choice." ;
proeth:option1 "Engineer A prepares a memo that surveys the full range of project delivery methods and financing alternatives available to the city, with objective analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each, enabling the city to make a fully informed decision." ;
proeth:option2 "Engineer A selectively presents only the delivery method that aligns with Engineer A's expertise and business interests, omitting alternatives that might lead the city toward a different procurement path, thereby narrowing the city's decision space in Engineer A's favor." ;
proeth:option3 "Recognizing the conflict of interest inherent in advising on method selection while also being a potential contractor, Engineer A discloses the conflict and recommends that the city retain an independent advisor to evaluate delivery options objectively." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Attributed to
claude-sonnet-4-6
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction