Engineer A Scope Boundary Recognition Adjacent Property Safety Observation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_Scope_Boundary_Recognition_Adjacent_Property_Safety_Observation
Properties
Instance of
Non-ContractualSafetyObservationScopeBoundaryRecognitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Non-ContractualSafetyObservationScopeBoundaryRecognitionObligation
Case context
Engineer A performing contracted construction observation services for Client X observes potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property arising from subcontractor work.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.86
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A must recognize that the professional scope of responsibility boundary is the key determinant of whether a mandatory safety obligation arises from the observation of potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property — and that because the observed condition is outside Engineer A's professional scope of responsibility, no mandatory obligation to act arises.
Temporal scope
Upon observation of potential safety issues on adjacent property
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Adjacent Property Safety Hazard Observation – Owner Y Site
derivedFromPrinciple
Scope-Bounded Public Safety Obligation Applied to Engineer A Adjacent Observation
Source Evidence
Source text
the unsafe condition observed by Engineer A is not within the professional scope of responsibility of Engineer A
Text references
The Board is of the view that this is a key factual distinction from the earlier BER cases
an engineer cannot be expected to take on personal or professional responsibility for each and every potential health and safety risk they may be exposed to during the course of a day
the unsafe condition observed by Engineer A is not within the professional scope of responsibility of Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case139: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case139:Engineer_A_Scope_Boundary_Recognition_Adjacent_Property_Safety_Observation a proeth:Non-ContractualSafetyObservationScopeBoundaryRecognitionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Scope Boundary Recognition Adjacent Property Safety Observation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case139:Engineer_A_Scope_Non-Excuse_Adjacent_Property_Safety_Owner_Y ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Adjacent_Property_Safety_Hazard_Observation_–_Owner_Y_Site> ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A performing contracted construction observation services for Client X observes potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property arising from subcontractor work." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.86" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case139:Scope-Bounded_Public_Safety_Obligation_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Adjacent_Observation ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:50:27.843700+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:50:27.843700+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Non-Contractual Safety Observation Scope Boundary Recognition Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A must recognize that the professional scope of responsibility boundary is the key determinant of whether a mandatory safety obligation arises from the observation of potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property — and that because the observed condition is outside Engineer A's professional scope of responsibility, no mandatory obligation to act arises." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the unsafe condition observed by Engineer A is not within the professional scope of responsibility of Engineer A" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon observation of potential safety issues on adjacent property" ;
proeth:textreferences "The Board is of the view that this is a key factual distinction from the earlier BER cases",
"an engineer cannot be expected to take on personal or professional responsibility for each and every potential health and safety risk they may be exposed to during the course of a day",
"the unsafe condition observed by Engineer A is not within the professional scope of responsibility of Engineer A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.766142"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:50:27.843700+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:50:27.843700+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.766142
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction