Engineer A Adjacent Third-Party Safety Disclosure Owner Y
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_Adjacent_Third-Party_Safety_Disclosure_Owner_Y
Properties
Instance of
AdjacentThird-PartyPropertySafetyDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdjacentThird-PartyPropertySafetyDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A observes potential safety issues from subcontractor work on Owner Y's adjacent property while performing contracted construction observation services for Client X through ES Consulting.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated to disclose the observed potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property to appropriate parties — at minimum ES Consulting — upon observation, notwithstanding the absence of any contractual relationship with Owner Y.
Temporal scope
Upon observation of the potential safety issues during the performance of construction observation services for Client X
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A Faithful Agent Client X Boundary Owner Y Safety, Engineer A Out-of-Scope Adjacent Safety Observation Non-Mandatory Response, Ethics Bodies Unlimited Safety Scope Imposition Prohibition Engineer A Case
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.
Text references
Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.
TTL
@prefix case139: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case139:Engineer_A_Adjacent_Third-Party_Safety_Disclosure_Owner_Y a proeth:AdjacentThird-PartyPropertySafetyDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Adjacent Third-Party Safety Disclosure Owner Y" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case139:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Client_X_Boundary_Owner_Y_Safety,
case139:Engineer_A_Out-of-Scope_Adjacent_Safety_Observation_Non-Mandatory_Response,
case139:Ethics_Bodies_Unlimited_Safety_Scope_Imposition_Prohibition_Engineer_A_Case ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case139:Engineer_A_Out-of-Scope_Adjacent_Site_Safety_Observation,
case139:Engineer_A_Personal_Conscience_Discretion_on_Adjacent_Site_Safety,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Potential_Unconfirmed_Safety_Risk_–_Adjacent_Subcontractor_Work> ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case139:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Client_X_Boundary_Owner_Y_Safety ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A observes potential safety issues from subcontractor work on Owner Y's adjacent property while performing contracted construction observation services for Client X through ES Consulting." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case139:Incidental_Observation_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A,
case139:Non-Contractual_Third-Party_Safety_Observation_Duty_Invoked_by_Engineer_A,
case139:Proactive_Risk_Disclosure_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_for_Owner_Y_Hazard ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Adjacent Third-Party Property Safety Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated to disclose the observed potential safety issues on Owner Y's adjacent property to appropriate parties — at minimum ES Consulting — upon observation, notwithstanding the absence of any contractual relationship with Owner Y." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon observation of the potential safety issues during the performance of construction observation services for Client X" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.759312"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.759312
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction