BER 65-12 Engineers Unsafe Product Refusal
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#BER_65-12_Engineers_Unsafe_Product_Refusal
Properties
Instance of
GoodFaithSafetyConcernWithoutDemonstrableViolationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GoodFaithSafetyConcernWithoutDemonstrableViolationState
Active period
From engineers' formation of the belief that the product was unsafe through their refusal to participate
Affected parties
Employer
Group of engineers (BER 65-12)
Public potentially exposed to the product
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Subject
Group of engineers who believed a product was unsafe and refused to participate in its processing or production
Terminated by
Engineers' departure from the project or resolution of the safety concern
Triggering event
Engineers' professional judgment that the product in question was unsafe
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
a group of engineers believed that a product was unsafe
Text references
a group of engineers believed that a product was unsafe
as long as the engineers held to that view, they were ethically justified in refusing to participate in the processing or production of the product in question
such action by the engineers would likely lead to loss of employment, but the engineers had a right to maintain their position
TTL
@prefix case139: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case139:BER_65-12_Engineers_Unsafe_Product_Refusal a proeth:GoodFaithSafetyConcernWithoutDemonstrableViolationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER 65-12 Engineers Unsafe Product Refusal" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From engineers' formation of the belief that the product was unsafe through their refusal to participate" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Employer",
"Group of engineers (BER 65-12)",
"Public potentially exposed to the product" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:39:56.265940+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:39:56.265940+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a group of engineers believed that a product was unsafe" ;
proeth:stateclass "Good Faith Safety Concern Without Demonstrable Violation State" ;
proeth:subject "Group of engineers who believed a product was unsafe and refused to participate in its processing or production" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineers' departure from the project or resolution of the safety concern" ;
proeth:textreferences "a group of engineers believed that a product was unsafe",
"as long as the engineers held to that view, they were ethically justified in refusing to participate in the processing or production of the product in question",
"such action by the engineers would likely lead to loss of employment, but the engineers had a right to maintain their position" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineers' professional judgment that the product in question was unsafe" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.756543"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:39:56.265940+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:39:56.265940+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.756543
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction