Inadequate Crutch Pile Remediation Reopening
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#Inadequate_Crutch_Pile_Remediation_Reopening
Properties
Instance of
AbsentPost-RemediationInspectionProtocolState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AbsentPost-RemediationInspectionProtocolState
Active period
From reopening after crutch pile installation through ongoing traffic use
Affected parties
County Commission
Engineer A
General public
Non-engineer public works director
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Subject
Two crutch piles installed as remediation for seven documented deficient pilings; bridge reopened
Terminated by
Not terminated within the case facts
Triggering event
Decision to install only two crutch piles despite engineering report identifying seven pilings requiring replacement, then reopening
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
a detailed inspection report prepared by a consulting engineering firm, signed and sealed, indicated seven pilings required replacement
Text references
No follow-up inspection was undertaken
a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit
a detailed inspection report prepared by a consulting engineering firm, signed and sealed, indicated seven pilings required replacement
TTL
@prefix case137: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case137:Inadequate_Crutch_Pile_Remediation_Reopening a proeth:AbsentPost-RemediationInspectionProtocolState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Inadequate Crutch Pile Remediation Reopening" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From reopening after crutch pile installation through ongoing traffic use" ;
proeth:affectedparties "County Commission",
"Engineer A",
"General public",
"Non-engineer public works director" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T05:17:09.660763+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T05:17:09.660763+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a detailed inspection report prepared by a consulting engineering firm, signed and sealed, indicated seven pilings required replacement" ;
proeth:stateclass "Absent Post-Remediation Inspection Protocol State" ;
proeth:subject "Two crutch piles installed as remediation for seven documented deficient pilings; bridge reopened" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated within the case facts" ;
proeth:textreferences "No follow-up inspection was undertaken",
"a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit",
"a detailed inspection report prepared by a consulting engineering firm, signed and sealed, indicated seven pilings required replacement" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Decision to install only two crutch piles despite engineering report identifying seven pilings requiring replacement, then reopening" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 137 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T05:45:21.984060"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 137 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
137
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T05:17:09.660763+00:00
First case
137
Generated
2026-03-01T05:17:09.660763+00:00
Attributed to
Case 137 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T05:45:21.984060
Generated by
ProEthica Case 137 Extraction