Engineer A Design-Build Scour Analysis Avoidance Transparency
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#Engineer_A_Design-Build_Scour_Analysis_Avoidance_Transparency
Properties
Instance of
Design-BuildContractScourAnalysisAvoidanceTransparencyObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Design-BuildContractScourAnalysisAvoidanceTransparencyObligation
Case context
A decision was made to use a design-build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design, a procurement choice with technical implications for the structural adequacy of the replacement bridge.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.75
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to transparently disclose to the County Commission and relevant stakeholders the technical rationale for choosing the design-build contract delivery method specifically to avoid the scour analysis, including any residual risks created by bypassing that analysis.
Temporal scope
At the time the design-build procurement decision was made and presented to the governing authority
Source Evidence
Source text
A decision was made to use a design build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design.
Text references
A decision was made to use a design build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design.
TTL
@prefix case137: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case137:Engineer_A_Design-Build_Scour_Analysis_Avoidance_Transparency a proeth:Design-BuildContractScourAnalysisAvoidanceTransparencyObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Design-Build Scour Analysis Avoidance Transparency" ;
proeth:casecontext "A decision was made to use a design-build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design, a procurement choice with technical implications for the structural adequacy of the replacement bridge." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.75" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T05:25:33.100530+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T05:25:33.100530+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Design-Build Contract Scour Analysis Avoidance Transparency Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to transparently disclose to the County Commission and relevant stakeholders the technical rationale for choosing the design-build contract delivery method specifically to avoid the scour analysis, including any residual risks created by bypassing that analysis." ;
proeth:sourcetext "A decision was made to use a design build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time the design-build procurement decision was made and presented to the governing authority" ;
proeth:textreferences "A decision was made to use a design build contract to avoid a lengthy scour analysis for the pile design." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 137 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T05:45:21.961206"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 137 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
137
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T05:25:33.100530+00:00
First case
137
Generated
2026-03-01T05:25:33.100530+00:00
Attributed to
Case 137 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T05:45:21.961206
Generated by
ProEthica Case 137 Extraction