Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
Confidence
0.88
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review and professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A in evaluating next steps after the bridge was reopened against engineering judgment
Used in context
Applies when the County Commission and public works director effectively rejected Engineer A's safety-based closure recommendation by authorizing reopening; governs Engineer A's obligations to document, advise of risks, and escalate
Version
Applicable at time of case (2000)
Source Evidence
Source text
a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit
Text references
Engineer A observes that traffic is flowing and the movement of the bridge is frightening
No follow-up inspection was undertaken
a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit
TTL
@prefix case137: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case137:Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance a proeth:EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review and professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T05:16:16.262629+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T05:16:16.262629+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A observes that traffic is flowing and the movement of the bridge is frightening",
"No follow-up inspection was undertaken",
"a decision was made to install two crutch piles under the bridge and to open the bridge with a 5-ton limit" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A in evaluating next steps after the bridge was reopened against engineering judgment" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Applies when the County Commission and public works director effectively rejected Engineer A's safety-based closure recommendation by authorizing reopening; governs Engineer A's obligations to document, advise of risks, and escalate" ;
proeth:version "Applicable at time of case (2000)" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 137 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T05:45:21.982359"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 137 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
137
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T05:16:16.262629+00:00
First case
137
Generated
2026-03-01T05:16:16.262629+00:00
Attributed to
Case 137 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T05:45:21.982359
Generated by
ProEthica Case 137 Extraction