DP5

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP5

Should Engineer A treat formal written dissent to the supervisor and a report of the retired inspector's potential unlicensed practice to the state licensure board as simultaneous obligations to be discharged concurrently with external escalation — or as sequential prerequisites that must be completed before contacting state and federal transportation authorities?

Engineer A Bridge Closure and Safety Monitor: Written Formal Dissent and Unlicensed Practice Reporting as Simultaneous Obligations Alongside External Escalation

Simultaneously transmit a formal written objection to the supervisor documenting the safety violation and professional override, file a report with the state licensure board identifying the retired inspector's structural assessment as potential unlicensed practice, and contact state and federal transportation authorities — treating all three acts as concurrent discharges of distinct but simultaneous obligations rather than sequential steps.

Prepare and transmit a formal written objection to the supervisor and await a documented response before contacting state and federal authorities, on the grounds that II.1.a's sequential structure requires a final internal notification to create the evidentiary predicate for external escalation — and that filing an unlicensed practice report requires first verifying the applicable statutory definition to avoid a premature or erroneous complaint.

Contact state and federal transportation authorities immediately given the active imminence of structural failure, and produce written documentation of the professional override and unlicensed practice concern as a parallel record-keeping act — treating the urgency of the safety threat as justifying external escalation before internal written dissent is formalized, while still creating the documentary record as soon as practicable.

Engineer A Bridge Closure and Safety Monitor