County Commission Bridge Safety Decision Authority
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#County_Commission_Bridge_Safety_Decision_Authority
Definition
The County Commission received the petition with ~200 signatures requesting reopening, heard Engineer A's explanation of damages and replacement efforts, and decided not to reopen the bridge — a decision later circumvented by the non-engineer public works director.
Properties
Instance of
CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority
Attributes
| type | Elected legislative body |
| jurisdiction | County |
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | receives_petition_from |
| target | Petition-Bearing Resident Community |
| type | receives_report_from |
| target | Engineer A Bridge Closure and Safety Monitor |
Role category
public_responsibility
Source Evidence
Source text
a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission
Text references
Engineer A explained the extent of the damages and the efforts under way to replace the bridge
The County Commission decided not to reopen the bridge
a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission
TTL
@prefix case137: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case137:County_Commission_Bridge_Safety_Decision_Authority a proeth:CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "County Commission Bridge Safety Decision Authority" ;
proeth:attributes "{'type': 'Elected legislative body', 'jurisdiction': 'County'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "The County Commission received the petition with ~200 signatures requesting reopening, heard Engineer A's explanation of damages and replacement efforts, and decided not to reopen the bridge — a decision later circumvented by the non-engineer public works director." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T05:16:18.987463+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T05:16:18.987463+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'receives_petition_from', 'target': 'Petition-Bearing Resident Community'}",
"{'type': 'receives_report_from', 'target': 'Engineer A Bridge Closure and Safety Monitor'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ;
proeth:roleclass "County Commission Bridge Reopening Authority" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A explained the extent of the damages and the efforts under way to replace the bridge",
"The County Commission decided not to reopen the bridge",
"a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 137 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T05:45:21.983483"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 137 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
137
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T05:16:18.987463+00:00
First case
137
Generated
2026-03-01T05:16:18.987463+00:00
Attributed to
Case 137 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T05:45:21.983483
Generated by
ProEthica Case 137 Extraction