BER 89-7 Engineer Client Safety Violation Insistence or Withdrawal
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#BER_89-7_Engineer_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal
Properties
Instance of
ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation
Case context
BER Case No. 89-7: The client made clear the building was being sold 'as is' with no remedial action planned; the engineer discovered code violations posing injury risk to occupants but did not insist on corrective action or withdraw.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer (BER Case No. 89-7)
Obligation statement
The engineer in BER 89-7 was obligated to insist that the client take appropriate corrective action regarding the electrical and mechanical code violations, or to withdraw from the project if the client refused, rather than passively accepting the client's 'as is' sale position.
Temporal scope
Upon discovering the electrical and mechanical code violations and client's refusal to remediate
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Insistence on Client Remedial Action or Withdrawal Invoked in BER 89-7
Source Evidence
Source text
the engineer should have insisted that the client take appropriate action or refuse to continue work on the project.
Text references
the client made it clear to the engineer that the building was being sold 'as is,' and the client was not planning to take any remedial action
the engineer should have insisted that the client take appropriate action or refuse to continue work on the project.
TTL
@prefix case137: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/137#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case137:BER_89-7_Engineer_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal a proeth:ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER 89-7 Engineer Client Safety Violation Insistence or Withdrawal" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case137:BER_89-7_Engineer_Confidentiality_Non-Override_Structural_Safety ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case137:BER_89-7_Engineer_Passive_Acquiescence_Independent_Ethical_Failure ;
proeth:casecontext "BER Case No. 89-7: The client made clear the building was being sold 'as is' with no remedial action planned; the engineer discovered code violations posing injury risk to occupants but did not insist on corrective action or withdraw." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case137:Insistence_on_Client_Remedial_Action_or_Withdrawal_Invoked_in_BER_89-7 ;
proeth:discoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T05:33:27.923922+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "137" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T05:33:27.923922+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer (BER Case No. 89-7)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client Safety Violation Insistence or Project Withdrawal Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The engineer in BER 89-7 was obligated to insist that the client take appropriate corrective action regarding the electrical and mechanical code violations, or to withdraw from the project if the client refused, rather than passively accepting the client's 'as is' sale position." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the engineer should have insisted that the client take appropriate action or refuse to continue work on the project." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon discovering the electrical and mechanical code violations and client's refusal to remediate" ;
proeth:textreferences "the client made it clear to the engineer that the building was being sold 'as is,' and the client was not planning to take any remedial action",
"the engineer should have insisted that the client take appropriate action or refuse to continue work on the project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 137 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T05:45:21.971592"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 137 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
137
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T05:33:27.923922+00:00
First case
137
Generated
2026-03-01T05:33:27.923922+00:00
Attributed to
Case 137 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T05:45:21.971592
Generated by
ProEthica Case 137 Extraction