Current Case: Attorney-Client Confidentiality Barrier to Imminent Structural Danger Disclosure
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#Current_Case:_Attorney-Client_Confidentiality_Barrier_to_Imminent_Structural_Danger_Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
Attorney-ClientConfidentialityBarriertoImminentDangerDisclosureState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Attorney-ClientConfidentialityBarriertoImminentDangerDisclosureState
Active period
From Engineer A's discovery of imminent structural danger through the point at which disclosure to tenants and public authorities is made
Affected parties
Attorney (client)
Engineer A
Property owner
Public authorities
Tenants
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's confidentiality obligation to attorney-client running against duty to warn tenants and public authorities of imminent structural danger
Terminated by
Engineer A notifying tenants and public authorities of the danger (as ethically required)
Triggering event
Engineer A discovering imminent danger to the structure while retained by attorney on behalf of owner, without attorney's authorization to disclose
Urgency level
critical
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A's client was the attorney and technically Engineer A had an obligation not to reveal facts, data or other information in a professional capacity without the prior consent of attorney
Text references
Engineer A's client was the attorney and technically Engineer A had an obligation not to reveal facts, data or other information in a professional capacity without the prior consent of attorney
Engineer A, having become aware of the imminent danger to the structure, had an obligation to make absolutely certain that the tenants and public authorities were made immediately aware of the dangers that existed
there were valid reasons why Engineer A should have revealed the information directly to the tenants and public authorities
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#Current_Case:_Attorney-Client_Confidentiality_Barrier_to_Imminent_Structural_Danger_Disclosure> a proeth:Attorney-ClientConfidentialityBarriertoImminentDangerDisclosureState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Current Case: Attorney-Client Confidentiality Barrier to Imminent Structural Danger Disclosure" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's discovery of imminent structural danger through the point at which disclosure to tenants and public authorities is made" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Attorney (client)",
"Engineer A",
"Property owner",
"Public authorities",
"Tenants" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A's client was the attorney and technically Engineer A had an obligation not to reveal facts, data or other information in a professional capacity without the prior consent of attorney" ;
proeth:stateclass "Attorney-Client Confidentiality Barrier to Imminent Danger Disclosure State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's confidentiality obligation to attorney-client running against duty to warn tenants and public authorities of imminent structural danger" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A notifying tenants and public authorities of the danger (as ethically required)" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's client was the attorney and technically Engineer A had an obligation not to reveal facts, data or other information in a professional capacity without the prior consent of attorney",
"Engineer A, having become aware of the imminent danger to the structure, had an obligation to make absolutely certain that the tenants and public authorities were made immediately aware of the dangers that existed",
"there were valid reasons why Engineer A should have revealed the information directly to the tenants and public authorities" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A discovering imminent danger to the structure while retained by attorney on behalf of owner, without attorney's authorization to disclose" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "critical" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 136 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:14:37.515761"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 136 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
136
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00
First case
136
Generated
2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00
Attributed to
Case 136 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:14:37.515761
Generated by
ProEthica Case 136 Extraction