Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework-Instance
Properties
Instance of
ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework
Confidence
0.95
Created by
Professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A when deciding whether to comply with the attorney's confidentiality directive
Used in context
Directly applicable framework for resolving the tension between Engineer A's duty of confidentiality to the retaining attorney/owner and the paramount obligation to protect tenants facing an immediate structural safety threat
Version
Current
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A discovers serious structural defects in the building which he believes constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the tenants
Text references
Engineer A complys with the request of the attorney
Engineer A discovers serious structural defects in the building which he believes constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the tenants
Upon reporting the findings to the attorney, Engineer A is told he must maintain this information as confidential as it is part of a lawsuit
TTL
@prefix case136: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case136:Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework-Instance a proeth:ClientConfidentialityvs.PublicSafetyBalancingFramework,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client-Confidentiality-vs-Public-Safety-Balancing-Framework-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T12:51:48.590460+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T12:51:48.590460+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Client Confidentiality vs. Public Safety Balancing Framework" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A discovers serious structural defects in the building which he believes constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the tenants" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A complys with the request of the attorney",
"Engineer A discovers serious structural defects in the building which he believes constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the tenants",
"Upon reporting the findings to the attorney, Engineer A is told he must maintain this information as confidential as it is part of a lawsuit" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A when deciding whether to comply with the attorney's confidentiality directive" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Directly applicable framework for resolving the tension between Engineer A's duty of confidentiality to the retaining attorney/owner and the paramount obligation to protect tenants facing an immediate structural safety threat" ;
proeth:version "Current" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 136 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:14:37.511549"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 136 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
136
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T12:51:48.590460+00:00
First case
136
Generated
2026-03-01T12:51:48.590460+00:00
Attributed to
Case 136 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:14:37.511549
Generated by
ProEthica Case 136 Extraction