BER 84-5: Client Cost-Driven Rejection of On-Site Safety Representative
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#BER_84-5:_Client_Cost-Driven_Rejection_of_On-Site_Safety_Representative
Properties
Instance of
ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
Active period
From client's refusal to hire on-site representative through Engineer A's decision to proceed with the project
Affected parties
Client
Engineer A
Public/project users
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's project engagement after client refused to fund on-site project representative
Terminated by
Project completion (ethical violation not remediated during project)
Triggering event
Client's determination that project would be too costly if a full-time on-site project representative were hired
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
the client indicated to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
Text references
Engineer A appeared to have acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not to the public but to the client's economic concerns
Engineer A proceeded with the work on the project even though he had recommended that a full-time, on-site project representative should be hired
the client indicated to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/136#BER_84-5:_Client_Cost-Driven_Rejection_of_On-Site_Safety_Representative> a proeth:ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER 84-5: Client Cost-Driven Rejection of On-Site Safety Representative" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client's refusal to hire on-site representative through Engineer A's decision to proceed with the project" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Engineer A",
"Public/project users" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "136" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the client indicated to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client Cost-Driven Safety Oversight Rejection State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's project engagement after client refused to fund on-site project representative" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Project completion (ethical violation not remediated during project)" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A appeared to have acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not to the public but to the client's economic concerns",
"Engineer A proceeded with the work on the project even though he had recommended that a full-time, on-site project representative should be hired",
"the client indicated to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client's determination that project would be too costly if a full-time on-site project representative were hired" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 136 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:14:37.514905"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 136 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
136
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00
First case
136
Generated
2026-03-01T12:53:52.514196+00:00
Attributed to
Case 136 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:14:37.514905
Generated by
ProEthica Case 136 Extraction