Engineer A Failure to Credit Design Team Members
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/135#Engineer_A_Failure_to_Credit_Design_Team_Members
Properties
Instance of
ImpliedSoleCreditMisrepresentationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ImpliedSoleCreditMisrepresentationState
Active period
From submission of resume through Board determination
Affected parties
Engineer A
Five unnamed staff engineers
Prospective employers
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's omission of any acknowledgment that design work was a team effort, failing to provide due credit to five co-engineers
Terminated by
Board's determination and guidance that Engineer A must express that design work was performed as a team effort
Triggering event
Engineer A presenting team-designed products without indicating collaborative authorship, in violation of Section III.10.a
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A appears to have been in violation of Section III.10.a. by failing to provide due credit to those five other staff engineers who worked with Engineer A in designing certain products
Text references
Engineer A appears to have been in violation of Section III.10.a. by failing to provide due credit to those five other staff engineers who worked with Engineer A in designing certain products
Engineer A has an obligation to express the fact that the design work was performed as a result of a team effort as opposed to an individual effort
TTL
@prefix case135: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/135#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case135:Engineer_A_Failure_to_Credit_Design_Team_Members a proeth:ImpliedSoleCreditMisrepresentationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Failure to Credit Design Team Members" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From submission of resume through Board determination" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Five unnamed staff engineers",
"Prospective employers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "135" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T15:39:26.461789+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "135" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T15:39:26.461789+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A appears to have been in violation of Section III.10.a. by failing to provide due credit to those five other staff engineers who worked with Engineer A in designing certain products" ;
proeth:stateclass "Implied Sole Credit Misrepresentation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's omission of any acknowledgment that design work was a team effort, failing to provide due credit to five co-engineers" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Board's determination and guidance that Engineer A must express that design work was performed as a team effort" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A appears to have been in violation of Section III.10.a. by failing to provide due credit to those five other staff engineers who worked with Engineer A in designing certain products",
"Engineer A has an obligation to express the fact that the design work was performed as a result of a team effort as opposed to an individual effort" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A presenting team-designed products without indicating collaborative authorship, in violation of Section III.10.a" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 135 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T15:57:44.736626"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 135 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
135
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T15:39:26.461789+00:00
First case
135
Generated
2026-03-01T15:39:26.461789+00:00
Attributed to
Case 135 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T15:57:44.736626
Generated by
ProEthica Case 135 Extraction