DP2

Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/134#DP2
Properties
Instance of
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP2
Decision question
Should Engineer A fully disclose all material circumstances surrounding Engineer C's interest — including that Engineer C has definitively withdrawn — before or when referencing prior third-party interest to Engineer B, or may Engineer A omit Engineer C's withdrawal on the grounds that partial disclosure of prior interest is sufficient?
Focus
Engineer A must decide whether to fully disclose all circumstances surrounding Engineer C's interest — including her definitive withdrawal — when making any reference to third-party competitive interest during negotiations with Engineer B. The Board identified full disclosure of Engineer C's circumstances as a conditional defense that, if exercised, would have changed the ethical outcome.
Option1
When referencing prior third-party interest to Engineer B, fully disclose all material circumstances — including that Engineer C initially expressed interest but has since definitively decided not to proceed — so that Engineer B can form an accurate understanding of the current competitive landscape and Engineer A retains the conditional ethical defense of complete disclosure.
Option2
Reference Engineer C's prior expressed interest to Engineer B without disclosing her subsequent withdrawal, on the basis that the prior interest is a real historical fact and that the current status of that interest is a matter of commercial confidentiality or negotiating strategy that Engineer A is not obligated to volunteer.
Option3
Refrain entirely from referencing Engineer C or any third-party interest — whether accurately or inaccurately — and instead pursue negotiation acceleration through means that do not implicate Engineer C's professional position or require disclosure decisions about her withdrawal status.
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case134: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/134#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case134:DP2 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP2" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP2" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A fully disclose all material circumstances surrounding Engineer C's interest — including that Engineer C has definitively withdrawn — before or when referencing prior third-party interest to Engineer B, or may Engineer A omit Engineer C's withdrawal on the grounds that partial disclosure of prior interest is sufficient?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer A must decide whether to fully disclose all circumstances surrounding Engineer C's interest — including her definitive withdrawal — when making any reference to third-party competitive interest during negotiations with Engineer B. The Board identified full disclosure of Engineer C's circumstances as a conditional defense that, if exercised, would have changed the ethical outcome." ; proeth:option1 "When referencing prior third-party interest to Engineer B, fully disclose all material circumstances — including that Engineer C initially expressed interest but has since definitively decided not to proceed — so that Engineer B can form an accurate understanding of the current competitive landscape and Engineer A retains the conditional ethical defense of complete disclosure." ; proeth:option2 "Reference Engineer C's prior expressed interest to Engineer B without disclosing her subsequent withdrawal, on the basis that the prior interest is a real historical fact and that the current status of that interest is a matter of commercial confidentiality or negotiating strategy that Engineer A is not obligated to volunteer." ; proeth:option3 "Refrain entirely from referencing Engineer C or any third-party interest — whether accurately or inaccurately — and instead pursue negotiation acceleration through means that do not implicate Engineer C's professional position or require disclosure decisions about her withdrawal status." ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T21:43:55.174894"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 134 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Generated
2026-02-28T21:43:55.174894
Generated by
ProEthica Case 134 Extraction