County Commission Bridge Safety Decision Authority
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#County_Commission_Bridge_Safety_Decision_Authority
Definition
The county commission that received Engineer A's safety explanation and a public petition of ~200 signatures requesting bridge reopening; ultimately decided not to reopen the bridge, acting in accordance with engineering safety recommendations in this instance.
Properties
Instance of
CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority
Attributes
| type | Elected legislative body |
| jurisdiction | County |
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | receives_petition_from |
| target | Public Petitioners |
| type | receives_report_from |
| target | Engineer A Local Government Bridge Safety Engineer (BER 00-5) |
Role category
public_responsibility
Source Evidence
Source text
A rally was held, and a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission.
Text references
A rally was held, and a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission.
Engineer A explained the extent of the damages and the efforts under way to replace the bridge.
The County Commission decided not to reopen the bridge.
TTL
@prefix case133: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/133#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case133:County_Commission_Bridge_Safety_Decision_Authority a proeth:CountyCommissionBridgeReopeningAuthority,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "County Commission Bridge Safety Decision Authority" ;
proeth:attributes "{'type': 'Elected legislative body', 'jurisdiction': 'County'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "The county commission that received Engineer A's safety explanation and a public petition of ~200 signatures requesting bridge reopening; ultimately decided not to reopen the bridge, acting in accordance with engineering safety recommendations in this instance." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "133" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T16:26:56.550897+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "133" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T16:26:56.550897+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'receives_petition_from', 'target': 'Public Petitioners'}",
"{'type': 'receives_report_from', 'target': 'Engineer A Local Government Bridge Safety Engineer (BER 00-5)'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ;
proeth:roleclass "County Commission Bridge Reopening Authority" ;
proeth:sourcetext "A rally was held, and a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission." ;
proeth:textreferences "A rally was held, and a petition with approximately 200 signatures asking that the bridge be reopened to limited traffic was presented to the County Commission.",
"Engineer A explained the extent of the damages and the efforts under way to replace the bridge.",
"The County Commission decided not to reopen the bridge." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 133 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T16:47:31.562055"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 133 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
133
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T16:26:56.550897+00:00
First case
133
Generated
2026-02-28T16:26:56.550897+00:00
Attributed to
Case 133 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T16:47:31.562055
Generated by
ProEthica Case 133 Extraction