Incidental Observation Disclosure Obligation Applied in Current Case

P · Principle Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Incidental_Observation_Disclosure_Obligation_Applied_in_Current_Case
Properties
Instance of
IncidentalObservationDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#IncidentalObservationDisclosureObligation
Applied to
Client B Building Safety Investigation Client
County Building Official (Current Case)
Balancing with
Client confidentiality
Contractual scope limitations
Concrete expression
Engineer A, retained for fire origin/cause investigation, independently observed structural instability outside the contracted scope and disclosed it to Client B and the county building official, fulfilling the initial disclosure obligation but not yet the full escalation obligation
Confidence
0.94
Importance
high
Interpretation
The disclosure obligation applies to safety-relevant observations outside contracted scope; Engineer A correctly made the initial disclosure but was required to continue escalating when the county official failed to respond
Invoked by
Engineer A (Current Case) Forensic Building Investigation Engineer
Tension resolution
The disclosure obligation overrides contractual scope limitations when a material safety risk is identified
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A brought his concerns to Client B and also contacted the county building official who did not return Engineer A's phone call.

Text references
Engineer A brought his concerns to Client B and also contacted the county building official who did not return Engineer A's phone call.
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case132:Incidental_Observation_Disclosure_Obligation_Applied_in_Current_Case a proeth:IncidentalObservationDisclosureObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Incidental Observation Disclosure Obligation Applied in Current Case" ; proeth:appliedto "Client B Building Safety Investigation Client", "County Building Official (Current Case)" ; proeth:balancingwith "Client confidentiality", "Contractual scope limitations" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ; proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A, retained for fire origin/cause investigation, independently observed structural instability outside the contracted scope and disclosed it to Client B and the county building official, fulfilling the initial disclosure obligation but not yet the full escalation obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.94" ; proeth:discoveredincase "132" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:interpretation "The disclosure obligation applies to safety-relevant observations outside contracted scope; Engineer A correctly made the initial disclosure but was required to continue escalating when the county official failed to respond" ; proeth:invokedby "Engineer A (Current Case) Forensic Building Investigation Engineer" ; proeth:principleclass "Incidental Observation Disclosure Obligation" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A brought his concerns to Client B and also contacted the county building official who did not return Engineer A's phone call." ; proeth:tensionresolution "The disclosure obligation overrides contractual scope limitations when a material safety risk is identified" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A brought his concerns to Client B and also contacted the county building official who did not return Engineer A's phone call." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.028880"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T18:05:10.669588+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.028880
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction