Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_Instance

Rs · Resource Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
Confidence
0.9
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional engineering community
Document title
Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard (Professional Norm)
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in determining Engineer A's continuing obligations after Client B and the county building official failed to respond adequately
Used in context
The operative professional norm governing how far an engineer's obligation to seek corrective action reaches when a client or authority fails to act on a reported safety concern, including graduated escalation through multiple authorities
Version
Current professional consensus
Source Evidence
Source text
professional engineers must decide, after pointing out the situation, how far their obligation to seek corrective action reaches

Text references
Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction
professional engineers must decide, after pointing out the situation, how far their obligation to seek corrective action reaches
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case132:Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_Instance a proeth:EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer_Public_Safety_Escalation_Standard_Instance" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional engineering community" ; proeth:discoveredincase "132" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard (Professional Norm)" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T17:55:01.121859+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T17:55:01.121859+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ; proeth:sourcetext "professional engineers must decide, after pointing out the situation, how far their obligation to seek corrective action reaches" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction", "professional engineers must decide, after pointing out the situation, how far their obligation to seek corrective action reaches" ; proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in determining Engineer A's continuing obligations after Client B and the county building official failed to respond adequately" ; proeth:usedincontext "The operative professional norm governing how far an engineer's obligation to seek corrective action reaches when a client or authority fails to act on a reported safety concern, including graduated escalation through multiple authorities" ; proeth:version "Current professional consensus" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.016306"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T17:55:01.121859+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T17:55:01.121859+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.016306
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction