Engineer A Current Case Certificate of Occupancy Authority Re-Notification
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Engineer_A_Current_Case_Certificate_of_Occupancy_Authority_Re-Notification
Properties
Instance of
CertificateofOccupancyAuthorityRe-NotificationAfterStructuralModificationDiscoveryObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CertificateofOccupancyAuthorityRe-NotificationAfterStructuralModificationDiscoveryObligation
Case context
The county building official had issued a certificate of occupancy following structural modifications to the building; Engineer A called the official but the call was not returned; the obligation to notify the issuing authority persisted and required escalation.
Compliance status
partial
Confidence
0.89
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (current case)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to notify the county building official — who had issued the certificate of occupancy following structural modifications — of the newly identified structural safety concern, recognizing that the official who granted occupancy approval bears regulatory responsibility for the building's continued safe use.
Temporal scope
Upon identifying the structural safety concern and learning that a certificate of occupancy had been issued following modifications
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Certificate of Occupancy Issued Despite Structural Deficiency
derivedFromPrinciple
Public Welfare Paramount Invoked by Engineer A in Current Case
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Text references
Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case132:Engineer_A_Current_Case_Certificate_of_Occupancy_Authority_Re-Notification a proeth:CertificateofOccupancyAuthorityRe-NotificationAfterStructuralModificationDiscoveryObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Current Case Certificate of Occupancy Authority Re-Notification" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case132:Engineer_A_New_Owner_Priority_Notification_Before_Official_Escalation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case132:Certificate_of_Occupancy_Issued_Despite_Structural_Deficiency ;
proeth:casecontext "The county building official had issued a certificate of occupancy following structural modifications to the building; Engineer A called the official but the call was not returned; the obligation to notify the issuing authority persisted and required escalation." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "partial" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case132:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_in_Current_Case ;
proeth:discoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (current case)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Certificate of Occupancy Authority Re-Notification After Structural Modification Discovery Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to notify the county building official — who had issued the certificate of occupancy following structural modifications — of the newly identified structural safety concern, recognizing that the official who granted occupancy approval bears regulatory responsibility for the building's continued safe use." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon identifying the structural safety concern and learning that a certificate of occupancy had been issued following modifications" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had an obligation to continue to pursue a resolution of the matter by working with Client B and in contacting the supervisor of the county official, the fire marshal, or any other agency having jurisdiction to determine whether an investigation was warranted after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.031879"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.031879
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction