Engineer A BER 07-10 Deadline-Conditioned County-State Building Official Escalation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#Engineer_A_BER_07-10_Deadline-Conditioned_County-State_Building_Official_Escalation
Properties
Instance of
Deadline-ConditionedEscalationtoHigherBuildingAuthorityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Deadline-ConditionedEscalationtoHigherBuildingAuthorityObligation
Case context
Engineer A verbally contacted the town supervisor who agreed to review the matter but took no action; Engineer A did not set a deadline or escalate to county or state building officials.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (BER Case 07-10)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated, if appropriate steps were not taken within a reasonable period, to again contact the town supervisor in writing with a specific deadline and notice that failure to act would require escalation to county or state building officials.
Temporal scope
After a reasonable period following the initial verbal notification to the town supervisor without corrective action
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Persistent Escalation Obligation Applied in BER Case 07-10
Source Evidence
Source text
If appropriate steps are not taken within a reasonable period of time, Engineer A should again contact the town supervisor in writing and indicate that if steps are not taken to adequately address the situation within a specific period of time, Engineer A would be required to bring the matter to the attention of county or state building officials, as appropriate.
Text references
If appropriate steps are not taken within a reasonable period of time, Engineer A should again contact the town supervisor in writing and indicate that if steps are not taken to adequately address the situation within a specific period of time, Engineer A would be required to bring the matter to the attention of county or state building officials, as appropriate.
TTL
@prefix case132: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/132#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case132:Engineer_A_BER_07-10_Deadline-Conditioned_County-State_Building_Official_Escalation a proeth:Deadline-ConditionedEscalationtoHigherBuildingAuthorityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A BER 07-10 Deadline-Conditioned County-State Building Official Escalation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case132:Engineer_A_BER_07-10_Proportional_Escalation_Non-Imminent_Barn_Collapse ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case132:Certificate_of_Occupancy_Issued_Despite_Structural_Concern_-_BER_Case_07-10 ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A verbally contacted the town supervisor who agreed to review the matter but took no action; Engineer A did not set a deadline or escalate to county or state building officials." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case132:Persistent_Escalation_Obligation_Applied_in_BER_Case_07-10 ;
proeth:discoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "132" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (BER Case 07-10)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Deadline-Conditioned Escalation to Higher Building Authority Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated, if appropriate steps were not taken within a reasonable period, to again contact the town supervisor in writing with a specific deadline and notice that failure to act would require escalation to county or state building officials." ;
proeth:sourcetext "If appropriate steps are not taken within a reasonable period of time, Engineer A should again contact the town supervisor in writing and indicate that if steps are not taken to adequately address the situation within a specific period of time, Engineer A would be required to bring the matter to the attention of county or state building officials, as appropriate." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After a reasonable period following the initial verbal notification to the town supervisor without corrective action" ;
proeth:textreferences "If appropriate steps are not taken within a reasonable period of time, Engineer A should again contact the town supervisor in writing and indicate that if steps are not taken to adequately address the situation within a specific period of time, Engineer A would be required to bring the matter to the attention of county or state building officials, as appropriate." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 132 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T18:17:34.031387"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 132 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
132
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
First case
132
Generated
2026-02-27T18:07:46.910384+00:00
Attributed to
Case 132 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T18:17:34.031387
Generated by
ProEthica Case 132 Extraction