Pertinent Fact Misrepresentation Intent-and-Purpose Dual-Element Test Applied to Firm
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/131#Pertinent_Fact_Misrepresentation_Intent-and-Purpose_Dual-Element_Test_Applied_to_Firm
Properties
Instance of
PertinentFactMisrepresentationIntent-and-PurposeDual-ElementTest
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PertinentFactMisrepresentationIntent-and-PurposeDual-ElementTest
Applied to
Firm marketing campaign literature
Prospective Client Brochure-Relying Engineering Services Consumer
Balancing with
Benevolent Motive Does Not Cure Ethical Violation
Concrete expression
The discipline misrepresentation satisfies the 'pertinent fact' element because an engineer's discipline is clearly and decisively relevant to a client's selection decision; the 'intent and purpose' element requires assessment of whether the firm knowingly listed Engineer A as electrical to enhance its apparent electrical engineering capacity
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Interpretation
Even if the original listing was inadvertent, the six-month failure to correct after explicit notification may satisfy the intent element — continued distribution of known-inaccurate materials with enhancement purpose constitutes purposeful misrepresentation
Invoked by
Firm Principal Inaction-Perpetuating Firm Principal Engineer
Marketing Director Credential-Misrepresenting Marketing Director Engineer
Tension resolution
Prolonged inaction after notification converts an initially inadvertent error into a purposeful misrepresentation; the dual-element test is satisfied at the point where correction is knowingly withheld
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A learns that the firm has begun a marketing campaign and in its literature lists Engineer A as an electrical engineer.
Text references
Engineer A learns that the firm has begun a marketing campaign and in its literature lists Engineer A as an electrical engineer.
However, after a period of six months, the error is not corrected.
the marketing director, indicates that the error will be corrected.
TTL
@prefix case131: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/131#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case131:Pertinent_Fact_Misrepresentation_Intent-and-Purpose_Dual-Element_Test_Applied_to_Firm a proeth:PertinentFactMisrepresentationIntent-and-PurposeDual-ElementTest,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Pertinent Fact Misrepresentation Intent-and-Purpose Dual-Element Test Applied to Firm" ;
proeth:appliedto "Firm marketing campaign literature",
"Prospective Client Brochure-Relying Engineering Services Consumer" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Benevolent Motive Does Not Cure Ethical Violation" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The discipline misrepresentation satisfies the 'pertinent fact' element because an engineer's discipline is clearly and decisively relevant to a client's selection decision; the 'intent and purpose' element requires assessment of whether the firm knowingly listed Engineer A as electrical to enhance its apparent electrical engineering capacity" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "131" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T11:32:12.236884+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "131" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T11:32:12.236884+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Even if the original listing was inadvertent, the six-month failure to correct after explicit notification may satisfy the intent element — continued distribution of known-inaccurate materials with enhancement purpose constitutes purposeful misrepresentation" ;
proeth:invokedby "Firm Principal Inaction-Perpetuating Firm Principal Engineer",
"Marketing Director Credential-Misrepresenting Marketing Director Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Pertinent Fact Misrepresentation Intent-and-Purpose Dual-Element Test" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A learns that the firm has begun a marketing campaign and in its literature lists Engineer A as an electrical engineer." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Prolonged inaction after notification converts an initially inadvertent error into a purposeful misrepresentation; the dual-element test is satisfied at the point where correction is knowingly withheld" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A learns that the firm has begun a marketing campaign and in its literature lists Engineer A as an electrical engineer.",
"However, after a period of six months, the error is not corrected.",
"the marketing director, indicates that the error will be corrected." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 131 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T11:50:23.659885"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 131 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
131
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T11:32:12.236884+00:00
First case
131
Generated
2026-03-01T11:32:12.236884+00:00
Attributed to
Case 131 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T11:50:23.659885
Generated by
ProEthica Case 131 Extraction