XYZ Consultants Supervisor Mentorship Response to Third Failure

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#XYZ_Consultants_Supervisor_Mentorship_Response_to_Third_Failure
Properties
Instance of
SupervisoryResponsetoLicensureConditionFailureMentorshipObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SupervisoryResponsetoLicensureConditionFailureMentorshipObligation
Case context
The supervisor at XYZ Consultants received Engineer Intern A's disclosure that his third PE exam attempt had failed and that the State X licensing board had imposed additional requirements before he could re-sit the exam.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.78
Importance
medium
Obligated party
XYZ Consultants Supervisor (Engineering Firm PE Licensing Supervisor)
Obligation statement
The supervising engineer at XYZ Consultants was obligated to respond to Engineer Intern A's disclosure of his third PE exam failure and board-imposed restrictions in a manner that balanced the firm's business interests with honest communication about employment consequences and appropriate professional guidance.
Temporal scope
Upon receiving Engineer Intern A's post-hire disclosure, approximately one month after hire
Source Evidence
Source text
A month after starting work, Engineer Intern A indicated to his supervisor that the PE exam results had been released and that his third attempt to pass the PE exam had been unsuccessful.

Text references
A month after starting work, Engineer Intern A indicated to his supervisor that the PE exam results had been released and that his third attempt to pass the PE exam had been unsuccessful.
Engineer Intern A also explained that the State X licensing board required additional experience and new references following a third failure before sitting for the exam again.
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case130:XYZ_Consultants_Supervisor_Mentorship_Response_to_Third_Failure a proeth:SupervisoryResponsetoLicensureConditionFailureMentorshipObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "XYZ Consultants Supervisor Mentorship Response to Third Failure" ; proeth:casecontext "The supervisor at XYZ Consultants received Engineer Intern A's disclosure that his third PE exam attempt had failed and that the State X licensing board had imposed additional requirements before he could re-sit the exam." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.78" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case130:Formative_Mentorship_Integrity_Invoked_By_XYZ_Consultants_Supervisor ; proeth:discoveredincase "130" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "130" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "XYZ Consultants Supervisor (Engineering Firm PE Licensing Supervisor)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Supervisory Response to Licensure Condition Failure Mentorship Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "The supervising engineer at XYZ Consultants was obligated to respond to Engineer Intern A's disclosure of his third PE exam failure and board-imposed restrictions in a manner that balanced the firm's business interests with honest communication about employment consequences and appropriate professional guidance." ; proeth:sourcetext "A month after starting work, Engineer Intern A indicated to his supervisor that the PE exam results had been released and that his third attempt to pass the PE exam had been unsuccessful." ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon receiving Engineer Intern A's post-hire disclosure, approximately one month after hire" ; proeth:textreferences "A month after starting work, Engineer Intern A indicated to his supervisor that the PE exam results had been released and that his third attempt to pass the PE exam had been unsuccessful.", "Engineer Intern A also explained that the State X licensing board required additional experience and new references following a third failure before sitting for the exam again." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 130 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T09:45:01.027921"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
130
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
First case
130
Generated
2026-02-26T09:29:31.184320+00:00
Attributed to
Case 130 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T09:45:01.027921
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction