PE-Examination-Attempt-Disclosure-Standard
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#PE-Examination-Attempt-Disclosure-Standard
Properties
Instance of
PEExaminationAttemptDisclosureStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PEExaminationAttemptDisclosureStandard
Confidence
0.95
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review (derived standard)
Document title
PE Examination Attempt Disclosure Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Board of Ethical Review in evaluating Engineer Intern A's conduct during the hiring process
Used in context
The normative standard under analysis in this case — governing whether Engineer Intern A had an ethical obligation to disclose two prior failed PE exam attempts to prospective employer XYZ Consultants; the Board concludes disclosure was prudent but not ethically required in this instance
Version
Derived from NSPE BER analysis
Source Evidence
Source text
the facts indicate Engineer Intern A did not lie, falsify statements, or misrepresent his qualifications prior to his hiring, but he stopped short of pointing out that he had failed the PE exam twice before
Text references
The ethical question becomes whether Engineer Intern A's failure to disclose could be considered fully 'objective and truthful' or 'omitting a material fact.'
it would have been prudent for Engineer Intern A to have been forthcoming about the past exam failures, but in this case, disclosure arguably was not ethically required
the facts indicate Engineer Intern A did not lie, falsify statements, or misrepresent his qualifications prior to his hiring, but he stopped short of pointing out that he had failed the PE exam twice before
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case130:PE-Examination-Attempt-Disclosure-Standard a proeth:PEExaminationAttemptDisclosureStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "PE-Examination-Attempt-Disclosure-Standard" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review (derived standard)" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "PE Examination Attempt Disclosure Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T09:24:28.099074+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T09:24:28.099074+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "PE Examination Attempt Disclosure Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the facts indicate Engineer Intern A did not lie, falsify statements, or misrepresent his qualifications prior to his hiring, but he stopped short of pointing out that he had failed the PE exam twice before" ;
proeth:textreferences "The ethical question becomes whether Engineer Intern A's failure to disclose could be considered fully 'objective and truthful' or 'omitting a material fact.'",
"it would have been prudent for Engineer Intern A to have been forthcoming about the past exam failures, but in this case, disclosure arguably was not ethically required",
"the facts indicate Engineer Intern A did not lie, falsify statements, or misrepresent his qualifications prior to his hiring, but he stopped short of pointing out that he had failed the PE exam twice before" ;
proeth:usedby "Board of Ethical Review in evaluating Engineer Intern A's conduct during the hiring process" ;
proeth:usedincontext "The normative standard under analysis in this case — governing whether Engineer Intern A had an ethical obligation to disclose two prior failed PE exam attempts to prospective employer XYZ Consultants; the Board concludes disclosure was prudent but not ethically required in this instance" ;
proeth:version "Derived from NSPE BER analysis" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 130 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T09:45:01.023096"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
130
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T09:24:28.099074+00:00
First case
130
Generated
2026-02-26T09:24:28.099074+00:00
Attributed to
Case 130 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T09:45:01.023096
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction