Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#Engineer_F_Contractor_License_Revocation_Omitting_Engineer
Definition
Engineer F, a PE and former fire sprinkler contracting firm owner, answered 'no' on an engineering firm employment application when asked about disciplinary actions against his professional engineering license, omitting that his contractor's license had been revoked for allowing an unlicensed individual to use his contractor license number. The Board found this omission was an ethical violation because it involved an actual adjudicated wrongdoing, not a mere allegation.
Properties
Instance of
ContractorLicenseRevocationOmittingEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ContractorLicenseRevocationOmittingEngineer
Attributes
| license_status | Professional Engineer |
| contractor_license | Revoked |
| pe_license | Not revoked or suspended |
| prior_role | Owner of fire sprinkler contracting firm |
| disclosure_action | Answered 'no' to disciplinary question on employment application |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | applicant_to |
| target | Engineering Firm Hiring Authority |
Role category
employer_relationship
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm
Text references
Engineer F had an ethical obligation to report on the employment application the revocation of his contractor's license
Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm
Engineer F responded in the negative on the employment application
Engineer F was the owner of a fire sprinkler contracting firm, which was required to have a contractor's license
Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number
TTL
@prefix case130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case130:Engineer_F_Contractor_License_Revocation_Omitting_Engineer a proeth:ContractorLicenseRevocationOmittingEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case130:Engineer_F_BER_03-6_Contractor_License_Revocation_Non-Disclosure,
case130:Engineer_F_BER_03-6_Non-Engineering_License_Disciplinary_History_Non-Disclosure ;
proeth:attributes "{'license_status': 'Professional Engineer', 'contractor_license': 'Revoked', 'pe_license': 'Not revoked or suspended', 'prior_role': 'Owner of fire sprinkler contracting firm', 'disclosure_action': \"Answered 'no' to disciplinary question on employment application\"}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer F, a PE and former fire sprinkler contracting firm owner, answered 'no' on an engineering firm employment application when asked about disciplinary actions against his professional engineering license, omitting that his contractor's license had been revoked for allowing an unlicensed individual to use his contractor license number. The Board found this omission was an ethical violation because it involved an actual adjudicated wrongdoing, not a mere allegation." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T09:24:54.036651+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "130" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T09:24:54.036651+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'applicant_to', 'target': 'Engineering Firm Hiring Authority'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "employer_relationship" ;
proeth:roleclass "Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F had an ethical obligation to report on the employment application the revocation of his contractor's license",
"Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm",
"Engineer F responded in the negative on the employment application",
"Engineer F was the owner of a fire sprinkler contracting firm, which was required to have a contractor's license",
"Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 130 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T09:45:01.023252"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 130 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
130
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T09:24:54.036651+00:00
First case
130
Generated
2026-02-26T09:24:54.036651+00:00
Attributed to
Case 130 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T09:45:01.023252
Generated by
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction