DP8

Individual 719c09e5
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#DP8
Properties
Parent
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP8
Decision Question
Once Engineer Intern A accepted the offer and the 90-day licensure clock began running, did his faithful agent obligation to XYZ Consultants require him to disclose his two prior PE exam failures as material risk information bearing on the feasibility of the employment condition — independent of whether the pre-hire silence was itself unethical?
Focus
Engineer Intern A: Post-Acceptance Faithful Agent Disclosure of Known Licensure Risk Once Employment Commences
Option1
Disclose both prior PE exam failures to XYZ Consultants at the commencement of employment, before the 90-day clock begins running, so the employer can make informed decisions about staffing, project assignments, and contingency planning
Option2
Proceed with employment without disclosing prior failures at commencement, on the basis that the pre-hire silence was not unethical and that the faithful agent obligation is satisfied by diligently preparing for and promptly disclosing the outcome of the third exam attempt
Option3
Disclose prior exam failures to the direct supervisor shortly after commencing employment — framed as a proactive risk briefing rather than a correction of a pre-hire omission — so the employer can assess contingency options while Engineer Intern A prepares for the third attempt
Role Label
Engineer Intern A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_130: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/130#DP8> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP8" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
719c09e5a5e01c23...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-26T10:01:18.541112
Generated By
ProEthica Case 130 Extraction